Text-Ex. 4.12. Let be a ring, a multiplicatively closed subset of . For any ideal , let denote the contraction of in . The ideal is called the saturation of with respect to . Prove that

  • i)
  • ii)
  • iii) meets
  • iv) .

If has a primary decomposition, prove that the set of ideals (where runs through all multiplicatively closed subsets of ) is finite.

\begin{proof} For any , we know for some and . Then there exists such that . Conversely, if such that for some , then in and so . Therefore, .

i) For any , there exists such that and . Then and so . On the other hand, if , then there exists such that and . Hence .

ii) For any , there exists such that and so for some . It deduces that and so . Thus . On the other hand, if , there exists such that and there exists such that . Then and . It yields .

iii) If , then and for some . Thus . Conversely, if meets , then there is and for all . So .

iv) For any , there exists such that , and then there exists such that . Then . On the other hand, for any , there exists such that . Then yields and so . Now we proved iv).

If has a primary decomposition, can be written as for finitely many primary ideals . Then . For each with , we have

p_i,&\text{if }p_i\cap S=\emptyset, \\ (1),&\text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$ For the former case, for any $x\in S(q_i)$, there exists $s\in S$ such that $sx\in q_i$. If $x\notin q_i$, then $s^n\in q_i\subseteq p_i$ and $s\in p_i$, which is a contradiction. Hence $x\in q_i$ and $S(q_i)\subseteq q_i$. Since $q_i\subseteq S(q_i)$ is trivial, we have $S(q_i)=q_i$. For the later case, since $p_i\cap S\neq \emptyset$, there exists $s\in p_i\cap S$ and so $s^n\in q_i$. Thus $q_i\cap S\neq\emptyset$ and $S(q_i)=(1)$. Now we have proved that $$S(q_i)=\begin{cases} q_i,&\text{if }p_i\cap S=\emptyset, \\ (1),&\text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$ Therefore, $S(a)=\cap_{i=1}^n S(q_i)$ has finitely many possibilities when $S$ runs through all multiplicatively closed subsets of $A$ as each $S(q_i)$ has only two possibilities. `\end{proof}` **Text-Ex. 4.13. Let $A$ be a ring and $\mathfrak{p}$ a prime ideal of $A$. The nth symbolic power of $\mathfrak{p}$ is defined to be the ideal (in the notation of Exercise 12)**

\mathfrak{p} ^{(n)}=S_\mathfrak{p} \left(\mathfrak{p} ^n\right)

**where $S_\mathfrak{p}=A-\mathfrak{p}$. Show that** - **i) $\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$ is a $\mathfrak{p}$-primary ideal.** `\begin{proof}` i) We firstly show $\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$ is a primary ideal. For any $xy\in \mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$, there exists $s_0\notin \mathfrak{p}$ such that $s_0xy\in \mathfrak{p}^n$. If $x\notin \mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$, then for any $s\notin \mathfrak{p}$, we have $sx\notin \mathfrak{p}^n$. Thus $s_0y\in \mathfrak{p}$, otherwise $s_0y\notin\mathfrak{p}$ and $(s_0y)x\in \mathfrak{p}^n$, which is impossible. Since $s_0\notin\mathfrak{p}$ and $\mathfrak{p}$ is a prime ideal, we have $y\in\mathfrak{p}$. Because $y\in \mathfrak{p}$, we know $y^n\in\mathfrak{p}^n\subseteq \mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$ and so $\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$ is primary. Now we prove $r(\mathfrak{p}^{(n)})=\mathfrak{p}$. For any $x\in \mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$, there exists $s\notin p$ such that $sx\in \mathfrak{p}$ and so $x\in \mathfrak{p}$. Hence $\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}\subseteq \mathfrak{p}$ and so $r(\mathfrak{p} ^{(n)})\subseteq r(\mathfrak{p})=\mathfrak{p}$. On the other hand, for any $x\in \mathfrak{p}$, there is $x^n\in \mathfrak{p}^n$ and so $sx^n\in\mathfrak{p}^n$ for all $s\notin \mathfrak{p}$, which deduces that $x^n\in S_\mathfrak{p}(\mathfrak{p}^n)$ and $x\in r(S_\mathfrak{p}(\mathfrak{p}^n))$. Therefore, $r(\mathfrak{p}^{(n)})=\mathfrak{p}$ and so $\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}$ is a $\mathfrak{p}$-primary ideal. `\end{proof}` **Problem C.(往年考试题)** **Let $A$ be a ring and $M$ a Noetherian $A$-module. Let $\mathfrak{a} \subset A$ be the annihilator of $M$, i.e., $\mathfrak{a}=\{x \in A \mid x M=0\}$. Prove that the ring $A / \mathfrak{a}$ is Noetherian.** `\begin{proof}` Since $M$ is finitely generated, we assume $M=\left\langle m_1,\cdots,m_k\right\rangle_A$. Define

\varphi:A\to M^k,a\mapsto (am_1,\cdots,am_k)

and then $\ker\varphi=\mathfrak{a}$. Hence $\varphi$ induces a map $\overline \varphi:A/\mathfrak{a}\hookrightarrow M^k$ and so $A/\frak a$ can be identified as a $M^k$-submodule. Then it is a Noetherian $A$-module. Since $\mathfrak{a}$ is trivial on $A/\mathfrak{a}$, $A/\mathfrak{a}$ is a Noetherian $A/\mathfrak{a}$-module and so the ring $A / \mathfrak{a}$ is Noetherian. `\end{proof}`