Equivalent definition of real type/complex type

To the extent that we are interested in the action of a group on real rather than complex vector spaces, the problem we face is to say which of the complex representations of we have studied are in fact real.

Definition

If a group acts on a real vector space , then we say the corresponding complex representation of is real.

Remark. In the other word, if is a matrix over for all , then the corresponding is real and so can be written as .

Recall that the character tables of and are same, and so all characters of are real. But the -dimensional representation of , which is defined here, can not defined over .

Proposition

The -dimensional representation of can not be defined over .

\begin{proof} Let be the subgroup of and let be a real vector space of dimension where acts by . Assume that the -dimensional representation of can be defined over , then the restriction of to is isomorphic to . Assume that , then

By solving it directly, does not exist. \end{proof}

Motivated by ^12152a, we have a classification of representations. An irreducible representation is one of the following:

  • is real;
  • is not real but is real;
  • is not real.

Proposition

Assume that is an irreducible representation, then the followings are equivalent:

  • is self-dual;
  • there exists non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form.

\begin{proof} Assume that is a non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form, then define

It follows that and so are equivalent.

Assume that and are equivalent, then there exists an isomorphism as modules, satisfying . Define . Note that

Therefore, is non-degenerated and -invariant. \end{proof}

Remark. Notice that is determined by . If are two different -invariant bilinear forms, then there exists distinct isomorphisms of modules . It follows that is an isomorphism. By Schur’s lemma, for some and so and so . Therefore, for a self-dual representation, there exists the unique non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form up to scalar.

Proposition

An irreducible representation V of is real if and only if there is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form B on V preserved by .

\begin{proof} See here. It is just a rewritten version of this lemma. \end{proof}

Real Irreducible Representation

Let be a real vector space and let be a set of basis. The complexification of is defined to be .

Note that

and can be identified by . Define . Then for a complex vector space , is decomplexification of .

The following proposition comes from here.

Proposition

Let be a real vector space on which acts irreducibly, the corresponding real representation of . Show that if is not irreducible, then it has exactly two irreducible factors, and they are conjugate complex representations of .

\begin{proof} Since is not irreducible, there exists an irreducible submodule . Define , then is also an irreducible submodule. It follows that either or . If , then is a submodule of , which is impossible. Therefore, .

Define , then is a submodule of and . Define , then is a submodule of and so . It deduces that

and so . Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Applications

For a finite group , define . Then

It follows that and so the number of involutions of is equal to .

If is even, then has at least one involutions and so there exists an irreducible such that , i.e. is of real type.

If is odd, then for all non-trivial irreducible representation. Therefore, for any non-trivial representation , is not self-dual and for each , the number of representations of dimension is even. Furthermore, for each non-trivial representation of , is odd.