Radical of Modules
maximal submodule
A maximal submodule of is a proper submodule satisfying implies or . Equivalently, is simple.
Definition
Define . If does not have maximal submodules, then define .
Lemma
Let be a proper -submodule of . If is finitely generated over , then there exists a maximal -submodule of containing . In particular, if is finitely generated, then there exists a maximal submodule of containing .
\begin{proof}
See ^fbacdf.
\end{proof}
Corollary
For every proper left ideal of , there exists a maximal left ideal of containing .
Lemma
Let be finitely generated -modules, and let be -morphism.
- .
- If is an epimorphism with , then .
\begin{proof}
See ^27mw0t.
\end{proof}
Lemma
Let be an -module.
Suppose that are maximal submodules of . Then there is a subset such that
Suppose that is Artinian, then is a semisimple and is the unique smallest submodule of with semisimple quotient.
\begin{proof}
See ^r8oe32.
\end{proof}
Nakayama lemma
Nakayama's lemma
Let be Noetherian(or finitely generated). Then is essential. Equivalently, if is a submodule of with , then .
\begin{proof}
See ^3f1b99.
\end{proof}
Proposition
- Suppose that and are -morphisms of -modules. If two of are essential, then so is the third.
- Let be a homomorphism of Noetherian modules. Then is an essential epimorphism iff the radical quotient is an essential epimorphism. In fact, if it holds, then the radical quotient is an isomorphism.
- Let be homomorphisms of Noetherian modules for , then are all essential epimorphisms iff is an essential epimorphism.
\begin{proof}
See ^q7sonb.
\end{proof}
Corollary
If and are projective Noetherian modules over a ring, then iff .
\begin{proof}
See ^9ry2ru.
\end{proof}
Semisimple
Definition
A ring with identity is called semisimple if is semisimple as a left -modules.
Remark. is called (left) regular module.
Theorem
TFAE for an Artinian ring .
- is a semisimple Artinian ring.
- Every -module is semisimple.
\begin{proof}
See ^7dokb6.
\end{proof}
Some Isomorphisms
Lemma
Let be a left -module. Then .
\begin{proof}
See ^cj265g
\end{proof}
Corollary
For any ring with identity, one has as rings.
\begin{proof}
See ^5830df
\end{proof}
Lemma
Let be a ring, and let be the set of all square matrices of degree over . Then .
\begin{proof}
See ^hvg28s.
\end{proof}
Artin–Wedderburn
Let be a semisimple Artinian ring with identity. Then is a direct sum of matrix rings over division rings. Specifically, if where are non-isomorphic simple modules occurring with multiplications , then where .
\begin{proof}
See ^f43ojz.
\end{proof}
Simple Modules
Definition
A ring is called simple if it has no ideal other than and .
Example. is a simple ring if is a division ring.
Notice that
and each part is a simple left -module.
Algebras
Definition
Let be a commutative ring with identity, and let be a ring with identity. We call an -algebra if is an -module such that for any and any . Equivalently, there is a ring homomorphism such that the image of lies in the center of .
Moreover, if is a field and is a finite-dimensional over , then we shall say that the algebra is finite-dimensional, which is both Noetherian and Artinian.
Examples.
- Suppose is a commutative ring with identity and is a finite group. Define group algebra/group ring as , which is a free -module with basis , then is a -algebra.
- For a field , the polynomial ring is a -algebra.
- For a commutative ring , is a -algebra, where .
Schur
Let be a -algebra, where is a field. Let be a simple -module. Then is a division ring, which is a -algebra.
If is finite dimensional over , so is .
Furthermore, if is finite dimensional and is algebraically closed, then .
\begin{proof}
See ^evw7zf.
\end{proof}