Exercise 2

1. If are measures and , then is a measure.

\begin{proof} Let . Since are measures and , for any , and . Then .

For any pairwise disjoint , we have that . Then

Therefore, is a measure. \end{proof}

2. Let be a measure space and .

  • i) Show that .
  • ii) Assume that there exists with such that for . Show that .

\begin{proof} i) For any subsequence satisfying , we aim to show . If it is true, then any limit point of is greater than or equal to and so . Note that , so we only need to prove . Define , and it is equivalent to show .

For any , let . For any , there is and so . Take , then for any . Take , then , that is, .

ii) Similarly, note that for any subsequence . To show any limit point of is less than or equal to , it suffices to show . Define , then we only need to show .

For any , let . For any , there is and so . Take , then for any . Since with , take , then , that is, . \end{proof}

3. If is a measure space and , then .

\begin{proof} Since and , we have that

So we finish the proof. \end{proof}

4. Let be a -algebra on . Let be a finite additive set function. Show that if is a family of disjoint subsets in then

\begin{proof} Since is a finite additive set function, then for any , there is . Let . Since is a -algebra, then . Then for any . Take , then . \end{proof}

5. Let be a probability space and be a sequence of sets such that . Show that .

\begin{proof} As for all , then for all . It follows that

Therefore, . \end{proof}

8. Assume that are measurable subsets of the measure space with the property that for . Show that

\begin{proof} Since are measurable subsets, then for all . It yields that

Repeat the procedure above, then we have that . Since , then . Take , there is

On the other hand, and so . Take , there is

Therefore, . \end{proof}

9. Let be a measurable space and assume that finitely additive and -subadditive. Show that is -additive.

\begin{proof} Note that for a family which is pairwise disjoint, there is

Since

then take and . Therefore, , that is, is -additive. \end{proof}

10. Let be a finite measure space and . Prove that is a -algebra of subsets of .

\begin{proof} Since and , then . For any , if , then ; if , then . It yields that if . For , if for all , then ; otherwise, there is a , and . Thus for any , . Therefore, is a -algebra. \end{proof}

11. Let be an algebra of subsets of a nonnegative set function on such that , and . Prove:

  • (a) is an algebra of subsets of .
  • (b) The restriction of to is finitely additive,
  • (c) If are pairwise disjoint and , then .

\begin{proof} (a) Note that for all . It yields that . For any ,

for all and so . Let . Notice that

Therefore, . For , we have that , . That is, . Hence, is an algebra.

(b) For any pairwise disjoint family , we have that

Therefore, is finitely additive.

(c) Since are pairwise disjoint, then

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

12. Let be a finite measure space and a positive, finitely additive set function on . Prove that if for any sequence with we have , then is a measure on .

\begin{proof} Let for all . Then and as . Thus for a constant and yield that . Hence . For a pairwise disjoint , define and . Since is finitely additive, we have that . Since be a finite measure space, then and by . It follows that . Note that , so we have that , that is, . Therefore, we prove that for any pairwise disjoint , and so is a measure on . \end{proof}

13. Let be a measure space and a mapping from onto . Prove that is a -algebra of subsets of and that the set function on given by is a measure, called the measure induced by .

\begin{proof} i) Since and , then . For any , and so . For , we have that and so . Therefore, is a -algebra.

ii) Note that . For any pairwise disjoint , are also pairwise disjoint and $$ \nu(\cup_{i=1}^\infty B_i)=\mu(T^{-1}(\cup_{i=1}^\infty B_i))=\mu(\cup_{i=1}^\infty T^{-1}(B_i))=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\mu(T^{-1}(B_i))=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\nu(B_i).

Therefore, $\nu$ is a measure. `\end{proof}`