Exercise 9
1. (i) Assume and . Prove that equality holds in (10.3) if and only if there exists a constant such that almost everywhere. (Hint. Use the proof of the Hölder inequality and the fact that equality holds in (9.2) if and only .)
(ii) Assume and Prove that equality holds in (9.4) if and only if there exists a constant such that almost everywhere. Hint. Use part (i) and the proof of the Minkowski inequality.
\begin{proof}
i) If , then
and . Hence , the equality holds.
Conversely, assume that the inequality holds. In the proof of Holder inequality, take and such that and , and then
yields that and Young’s inequality holds. Hence, almost everywhere. Therefore, there exists a constant such that .
ii) If , then
and
On the other hand, assume that the inequality holds. Then in the proof of Minkowski inequality
holds iff . Therefore, there exists a constant such that .
\end{proof}
3. Let . Show that there exists a measurable set such that
\begin{proof}
Define , then by lemma 10.6. By the definition of , . On the other hand, if , there exists such that and so , contradiction. Hence, .
\end{proof}
8. Let be nonnegative and satisfying a.e. in . Show that
(Hint: notice that the positive part and the negative part of have the same integral to obtain
Then, apply the dominated convergence theorem.)
\begin{proof}
Since , there is
and so . It deduces that . Since a.e. in , there exists such that almost everywhere when . Then by DCT, we have and so for . Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
9. Show that the following extension of Fatou’s lemma: if , with nonnegative, in , then
whenever the right hand side is well defined. (Hint: prove first the statement under the additional assumption that a.e. in .)
\begin{proof}
Since , by Fatou’s lemma there is
To show , it suffices to show . Since in , we have as . Note that
yields that . By Fatou’s lemma there is and so . Then deduces that .
\end{proof}
10. Let be nonnegative functions. Show that the conditions
imply the convergence of to in . (Hint: use exercise 8.)
\begin{proof}
The conditions and Fatou’s lemma yield that
It follows that . By exercise 8, we have , that is, converges to in .
\end{proof}
11. Let be a finite measure space. Show that for all . Also, show that, if is measurable, then
\begin{proof}
To show , it suffices to show for any satisfying , there is . By lemma 10.6, a.e., it deduces that
Therefore, .
For any simple function , we have and . Since is measurable, there exists a sequence of simple functions such that . Then by MCT we have .
\end{proof}
12. Let and be measurable functions on such that . Then
(This is Minkowski’s Inequality for .)
\begin{proof}
Let . Then for any and . If one of and equals , then and yield that the inequality holds. Now assume that and .
Define , then by Jensen’s inequality we have
It deduces that and so .
\end{proof}
13. a) Let and let as . Show that as .
b) Suppose a.e and as . Show that as .
\begin{proof}
a) Note that
and , then we have by the sandwich theorem.
b) Since is a Banach space and , we have . Note that and , then by DCT we have
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
15. Let and be conjugate indices and , where and . Show that .
\begin{proof}
Note that by the Holder inequality we have
as and . Therefore, .
\end{proof}
17. Let . Show that the inclusion implies that the inclusion map is continuous. (Hint: use closed graph theorem.)
\begin{proof}
Closed graph theorem: if a linear operator between Banach spaces has a closed graph, then the operator is continuous.
By the closed graph theorem, it suffices to show the graph is closed. Suppose is a sequence in and in , in . Note that there exists a subsequence such that pointwise a.e. In , assume that in . Then there is a subsequence pointwise a.e. It deduces that a.e. Therefore, and so is closed in . By closed graph theorem, is continuous.
\end{proof}
18. Let be a finite measure space. Assume that . Let
Prove that
\begin{proof}
Note that for all . By exercise 11, we have . Then
because as .
\end{proof}
21. Let be a measure space, , and defined on with , such that in . Prove that in .
\begin{proof}
We say in if for all continuous linear functional on , there is as . The following proof is a proof of Radon-Riesz property.
WLOG we assume that , otherwise take . Recall that is uniformly convex, then it suffices to show
Since , we have . Then by we have . Since , there is
Note that has norm at most , then and so .
\end{proof}
A Banach space is said to satisfy the Radon-Riesz property (or the Kadec-Klee property) if: A sequence (i.e., ), if and only if:
- converges weakly to , and
- .