Definition

Let be an incidence geometry where

  • set of points
  • set of blocks
  • incidence relation

Define and .

De Bruijn–Erdős

If for all , any two distinct points are in precisely one block simultaneously, then or .

\begin{proof} This proof is given by Conway. Let denote the number of blocks through . For a block , let denote the number of points on .

Suppose that . If , then . Suppose that , then . We also have

and

Hence

leading to a contradiction. Therefore, . \end{proof}

A - design is a point-block geometry where is a set of points and is a collection of -subsets of , with the property that every -subset of is contained in exactly blocks of .

Link to original

Examples.

  • When , such design is called “Steiner system” . In particular, is a Steiner triple system. For instance, see here.
  • is a - design
  • is a - design
  • is a - design
  • Hermitian unital is a - design. Conversely, such design - in projective plane is called unital.
  • A Hadamard matrix of order gives a - design.
    • Let be a Hadamard matrix of order with the first row and the first column all ‘s.
    • Let be the principal sub-matrix of with the first row and first column deleted.
    • .
    • .
  • Another example, :

Theorem

The number of blocks of a - design is

\begin{proof} Count pairs , where , , . \end{proof}

Theorem

Given with , the number of blocks incident with a fixed -subset of is

In the other words, a -design is also a -design.

\begin{proof} Same as for ^dz2c5i, but with . \end{proof}

Remark. Usually is denoted by , and is called replication number. The following equations is useful for -designs: and .

Example. Consider a - design . Then and so . Moreover, yields .

Remark. These conditions are sufficient. - designs eventually exist for fixed, plus divisible condition from ^25ec95. By Peter Keevash (2014). Explicit construction only for . For small , the divisibility conditions from the ‘s are not sufficient. Tits (1964) design does not exist.

Theorem

In a non-trivial Steiner system , we have .

\begin{proof} In a Steiner system , any two distinct blocks have at most points in common. Let be a set of points not contained in any block. (Here we use non-triviality) For each , there exists a unique block containing . Each such is incident with points not in . Any point not in is incident with at most one (as ). Hence . \end{proof}

Incidence matrix , indexed by

Then . Moreover, . For Hermitian unital, . For , .

Theorem

For a - design with blocks and , we have .

\begin{proof} Recall that . So , then . Thus has spectrum , . Thus as . Hence and so . \end{proof}

Theorem

If a - design has and is even, then is a square.

\begin{proof} Note that yields . Then . \end{proof}

Theorem

For , , , we have .

\begin{proof} See A course in combinatorics - 2001 - van Lint, Wilson.pdf, theorem 19.8. \end{proof}

Examples of symmetric design:

  • Hadamard matrices are - design
  • projective planes are - design.

FI thinks that otherwise only a finitely many of symmetric designs is known.

Bruck-Ryser-Chowla

Let be positive integer such that , then a symmetric - design has the following necessary conditions

  • even square
  • odd has a solution .