Theorem
If and is quasiprimitive on , then is HA, AS or and acts on in product action, where induces a -transitive action on .
\begin{proof}
By the following lemmas.
\end{proof}
Lemma
Let be regular on . Then . In particular, if is nonsolvable, then .
\begin{proof}
Identify with and let . Then and acts on by conjugation. Now the action of on partitions into orbits, whose number the number of fusion classes of . Suppose that is non-solvable. Then by Burnside’s Theorem, there exist , , such that , and . Since , , are in different fusion classes, we have .
\end{proof}
Corollary
With the lemma above, is not of type HS, HC, TW.
Lemma
Let be a quasiprimitive group of type SD. Then .
\begin{proof}
Let N=T^k\lhd_\min G. Write where are isomorphic. Then , and is regular on . Note that and with a representation . Observe that iff .
Note that , normalizes and induces an action on transitively by N\lhd_\min G (need proof). The stabilizer and acts on by conjugation transitively and faithful ( and yields ). Each element of has the form with and .
Pick two elements and are two nontrivial elements of . Then lie in the same orbits of iff there exists such that .
- If , then and so they are conjugate in .
- If , the where the latter is conjugate to . Then and so , i.e., and so are conjugate by .
- If , then , which is impossible.
Therefore, and lie in the same -orbits iff
- , or
- and , and we say and are inverse conjugate in .
Thus .
\end{proof}
Example. and . Then .
Let , where . For , define and such that acts on naturally. We say acting on is a blow-up of on .
Lemma
Using the notation above, we have
- ;
- iff and is -transitive on .
\begin{proof}
(i) Fix . For a point , define . Then if , then for any . Since preserves the weight of each point and the weight function ranges , group has at least orbits and .
(ii) Assume , then and . The set of all points with weight forms an orbits of . Thus is transitive on and so is -transitive on . Conversely, assume that and is -transitive on . Since is transitive on , then the set of all points with weight is an orbit and so for weight .
\end{proof}
Corollary
CD is not rank .
\begin{proof}
Since CD is a blow up of SD, and SD is not -transitive. So CD is not rank by the lemma above.
\end{proof}