Definition
Let be a finite group of order , where are the prime divisors of . Let . For a subset , a subgroup is called a Hall -subgroup of if and .
Remark. Note that Hall subgroups do NOT always exist, and two Hall subgroups are NOT always conjugate.
- Let . Suppose with . Then is of size . Since is simple, acting on is faithful. So we have , which is impossible. Therefore, -Hall subgroup does not exist.
- Let . This group has two subgroups and , which are Hall -subgroups of but not conjugate.
Theorem
Let be a finite group of order where are prime. Then is solvable if and only if has Hall -subgroups for each subset .
\begin{proof}
If , then is solvable as -group has nontrivial center. If , by Burnside’s Theorem is solvable. Now we assume that and assume inductively that this theorem holds for groups of which the order has at most prime divisors including multiplicity.
i) Firstly, assume that has Hall subgroups for all . We aim to show is a solvable group. Let be a Hall -subgroup of for , where . By induction hypothesis, is solvable. There exists a prime divisor of such that . Since divides or , WLOG we may assume that divides . Let be a Sylow -subgroup of . Then is a Sylow -subgroup of . Furthermore, by Sylow theorem for some . We have , because
Let be the normal closure of in . Then . For any , there exist and such that . Then we have and so . Thus is the proper normal subgroup of .
For a Hall -subgroup of , we have that is a Hall -subgroup of by computing , and is a Hall subgroup of . By induction hypothesis and are solvable, which yields that is solvable.
ii) Conversely, assume that is solvable. Take a subset with , and it suffices to find a Hall -subgroup of . Let . Then for some prime and is solvable. Let be a Hall -subgroup of . If , then the full preimage of under is a Hall -subgroup of . Otherwise, if , then .
Define as the full preimage of under . If , then by induction, has a Hall -subgroup which is isomorphic to , and is a Hall -subgroup of . So now we suppose that .
Since is solvable, there exists a prime such that . Let be the full preimage of under , and let be a Sylow -subgroup of . Remark that and , because . For any and , we have and so .
Assume that . With this assumption, we claim that . Since , there is . Take an element and a preimage under . Then and so . Since is a Sylow -subgroup of , there exists such that by Sylow theorem, that is, . If there is another such that with , then and it yields . Therefore, there is a unique such that . Define
Suppose . Then yields that and so is injective. Thus and we prove the claim.
If , then is a Hall -subgroup of . Otherwise, if , then
which is impossible.
Now we assume that . Let . Note that yields that . Since and , we have and so . Thus is a normal subgroup of . Let be a Hall -subgroup of . Then the full preimage of under is a Hall -subgroup of .
\end{proof}
Remark. The proof of ii) is similar as a Lemma of Cohomology.
Theorem
Hall subgroups are conjugate if is solvable.
\begin{proof}
Let be a solvable group. Let such that is a prime . The existence of is guaranteed by the composition series of . Let be Hall -subgroups of . If , then and are conjugation by induction. If , then , are Hall -subgroups of . By induction hypothesis, there is a such that .
WLOG we may assume that Hall -subgroups and satisfies . It suffices to show and are conjugate. Let . If , then by induction hypothesis, and are Hall -subgroups of and so they conjugate in . Then we suppose that , that is, .
Let . Note that is a normal subgroup of . Since and are Hall subgroups of , by induction hypothesis, we have a such that . As , there is a such that . Let for some preimage of under . Then by , we have and so . Therefore, and are conjugate.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be a finite solvable group and be any set of primes. Then any subgroup whose order is a product of primes in is contained in some Hall -subgroup.
\begin{proof}
Suppose is a -subgroup of and is a Hall -subgroup of . Note that
we have that . So if , then is a Hall -subgroup of . Since the Hall -subgroup of is itself, there is and . Therefore, if is not contained in any Hall -subgroup, then for all Hall -subgroup .
Take a prime . Let be a Sylow -subgroup of , and let be a Sylow -subgroup of Hall -subgroup . As is a Sylow -subgroup of , then there exists a such that . Then is a Hall -subgroup and , contradiction.
\end{proof}
Schur-Zassenhaus
Let be a Hall subgroup of . Then:
- has complement in ;
- if one of is solvable and are complements of in , then there exists such that .
Remark. By Feit–Thompson theorem, one of is odd and so ii) always hold.