It comes from chapter 7, Steinberg_2012_Representation theory of finite groups.pdf.

permutation representation

Let be a group action. Define a representation by setting

One calls the permutation representation associated to .

fixed subspace

Let be a representation. Then

is the fixed subspace of .

We can prove that (see Proposition 7.2.7), is the direct sum of all the copies of the trivial representation in . In the other word, for a representation and the trivial character of , there is

Proposition

Let be a group action. Let be the orbits of on and define . Then is a basis for , the fixed subspace of , and hence is the number of orbits of on .

By ^a5ygsc, we know that for every permutation representation , it has at least trivial representation as a constituent, where is the number of orbits of . Thus is not irreducible if its degree is not . As a corollary of this proposition, we prove the Burnside’s lemma.

Burnside's lemma

Let be a group action and let be the number of orbits of on . Then $$ m=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g\in G}|\mathrm{Fix}(g)|.

Consider the group action , then we get the following corollary.

Corollary

Let be a transitive group action. Then the equalities

Definition

For a transitive group action , by ^a5ygsc, it has only one trivial sub-representation, denoted by . Since is a permutation matrix for all , the representation of is unitary and so it is decomposable by ^0m7u7u. Then can be decomposed as where .

Let be the restriction of to , then it is called the augmentation representation associated to .

By ^8a0152, we can use the augmentation representation to describe the rank of , which deduces the following theorem.

Theorem

Let be a transitive group action. Then the argumentation representation is irreducible iff is -transitive on .

\begin{proof} Since is transitive, by ^a5ygsc, has exactly one trivial sub-representation and so . Then is irreducible iff iff , because

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Remark. Similarly, one can prove that if can be expressed as sum of two irreducible sub-representations, it is of rank . It is used in Kantor_Liebler_1982_The Rank 3 Permutation Representations of the Finite Classical Groups.pdf.