TL;DR: Odd graph is not cayley.
Def. Let and let . Define a graph with vertex set s.t. two vertices are adjacent iff they are disjoint. This graph is called an odd graph, denoted by .
Note that the number of vertices is , and the valency of is .
For a graph , an independent set of is the maximal set whose vertices are nonadjacent pairwise. The independence number is cardinal number of a independent set.
The independent set of is . For example, is an independent set and it corresponds to a unique element .
So we get a proposition:
Prop. .
When , is Petersen graph and so is not Cayley. In fact, every odd graph with is not Cayley.
Thm. If , then is vertex-transitive, edge-transitive but not Cayley.
Proof. is Petersen, so it suffices to show the case of . Suppose is a Cayley graph of . Note that is -homogeneous. Assume is -transitive. Consider the sequence we have and so if , which is impossible. Therefore, is -homogeneous but not -transitive. By Kantor’s theorem, there are only finitely many group satisfying the condition. Compute orders of them and then we know all of them are impossible.
