TL;DR: Odd graph is not cayley.

Def. Let and let . Define a graph with vertex set s.t. two vertices are adjacent iff they are disjoint. This graph is called an odd graph, denoted by .

Note that the number of vertices is , and the valency of is .

For a graph , an independent set of is the maximal set whose vertices are nonadjacent pairwise. The independence number is cardinal number of a independent set.

The independent set of is . For example, is an independent set and it corresponds to a unique element .

So we get a proposition:

Prop. .

When , is Petersen graph and so is not Cayley. In fact, every odd graph with is not Cayley.

Thm. If , then is vertex-transitive, edge-transitive but not Cayley.

Proof. is Petersen, so it suffices to show the case of . Suppose is a Cayley graph of . Note that is -homogeneous. Assume is -transitive. Consider the sequence we have and so if , which is impossible. Therefore, is -homogeneous but not -transitive. By Kantor’s theorem, there are only finitely many group satisfying the condition. Compute orders of them and then we know all of them are impossible.