TL;DR: Odd graph is not cayley.
Def. Let and let . Define a graph with vertex set s.t. two vertices are adjacent iff they are disjoint. This graph is called an odd graph, denoted by .
Note that the number of vertices is , and the valency of is .
For a graph , an independent set of is the maximal set whose vertices are nonadjacent pairwise. The independence number is cardinal number of a independent set.
The independent set of is . For example, is an independent set and it corresponds to a unique element .
So we get a proposition:
Prop. .
When , is Petersen graph and so is not Cayley. In fact, every odd graph with is not Cayley.
Thm. If , then is vertex-transitive, edge-transitive but not Cayley.
Proof. is Petersen, so it suffices to show the case of . Suppose is a Cayley graph of . Note that is -homogeneous. Assume is -transitive. Consider the sequence $$ R>R_{\omega_1}>R_{\omega_1,\omega_2}>\cdots>R_{\omega_1,\cdots,\omega_{k-1}},
we have $|R|/|R_{\omega_1}|=|\omega_1^R|=2k+1,\cdots,|R_{\omega_1\cdots,\omega_{k-2}}|/|R_{\omega_1,\cdots,\omega_{k-1}}|=k+3$ and so $|R|\geq (2k+1)!/(k+2)!>{2k+1\choose k}=|R|$ if $k\geq 3$, which is impossible. Therefore, *$R$ is $k$-homogeneous but not $k$-transitive*. By [Kantor's theorem](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/k-Homogeneous-groups-Kantor/80f56524d6a4cefc1c71a0727b331120811115b8), there are only finitely many group satisfying the condition. Compute orders of them and then we know all of them are impossible. ![[Pasted image 20240430190559.png]]