Equivalent definition of real type/complex type
To the extent that we are interested in the action of a group on real rather than complex vector spaces, the problem we face is to say which of the complex representations of we have studied are in fact real.
Definition
If a group acts on a real vector space , then we say the corresponding complex representation of is real.
Remark. In the other word, if is a matrix over for all , then the corresponding is real and so can be written as .
Recall that the character tables of and are same, and so all characters of are real. But the -dimensional representation of , which is defined here, can not defined over .
Proposition
The -dimensional representation of can not be defined over .
\begin{proof}
Let be the subgroup of and let be a real vector space of dimension where acts by . Assume that the -dimensional representation of can be defined over , then the restriction of to is isomorphic to . Assume that , then
By solving it directly, does not exist.
\end{proof}
Motivated by ^12152a, we have a classification of representations. An irreducible representation is one of the following:
- is real;
- is not real but is real;
- is not real.
Proposition
Assume that is an irreducible representation, then the followings are equivalent:
- is self-dual;
- there exists non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form.
\begin{proof}
Assume that is a non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form, then define
It follows that and so are equivalent.
Assume that and are equivalent, then there exists an isomorphism as modules, satisfying . Define . Note that
Therefore, is non-degenerated and -invariant.
\end{proof}
Remark. Notice that is determined by . If are two different -invariant bilinear forms, then there exists distinct isomorphisms of modules . It follows that is an isomorphism. By Schur’s lemma, for some and so and so . Therefore, for a self-dual representation, there exists the unique non-degenerated -invariant bilinear form up to scalar.
Proposition
An irreducible representation V of is real if and only if there is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form B on V preserved by .
\begin{proof}
See here. It is just a rewritten version of this lemma.
\end{proof}
Real Irreducible Representation
Let be a real vector space and let be a set of basis. The complexification of is defined to be .
Note that
and can be identified by . Define . Then for a complex vector space , is decomplexification of .
The following proposition comes from here.
Proposition
Let be a real vector space on which acts irreducibly, the corresponding real representation of . Show that if is not irreducible, then it has exactly two irreducible factors, and they are conjugate complex representations of .
\begin{proof}
Since is not irreducible, there exists an irreducible submodule . Define , then is also an irreducible submodule. It follows that either or . If , then is a submodule of , which is impossible. Therefore, .
Define , then is a submodule of and . Define , then is a submodule of and so . It deduces that
and so . Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
Applications
For a finite group , define . Then
It follows that and so the number of involutions of is equal to .
If is even, then has at least one involutions and so there exists an irreducible such that , i.e. is of real type.
If is odd, then for all non-trivial irreducible representation. Therefore, for any non-trivial representation , is not self-dual and for each , the number of representations of dimension is even. Furthermore, for each non-trivial representation of , is odd.