Let be an algebra over a commutative ring , and let be an -module. If is a homomorphism to another commutative ring , we form the -algebra , and becomes an -module.

  • If is a subring of , we say that the module is obtained from by extending the scalar form to .
    • If an -module has the form , we say that is written in .
    • When is free as an -module, we can identify with , and an -basis of becomes an -basis of .
  • If with an ideal , applying to an -module is the same as reducing modulo .
    • If is an -module of the form for some -module , then we say can be lifted to and is a lift of .

Proposition

Let be fields where is algebraic over , and let be a finite-dimensional -algebra. Let be a finitely-dimensional -module. Then there exists a field with of finite degree over so that is written in .

\begin{proof} Let be an -basis of , and let acts with matrix w.r.t. some -basis of . Then and . Note that acts on by matrices over the field .

To show is written in , it suffices to find a -module such that .

Define . Since acts on by matrices over the field , we know and so is a -module.

Since is a set of -basis of , has -basis . Define

then is an isomorphism between -vector spaces. Furthermore, notice that

and so is an morphism between -modules. \end{proof}

Definition

Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra where is a field. A simple -module is said to be absolutely simple if is simple as an -module for all extension field of .

Definition

We say an extension field of is a splitting field of if every simple -module is absolutely irreducible.

Proposition

Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra over field , and let be a simple -module. TFAE:

  • is absolutely irreducible;
  • ;
  • The matrix algebra summand of corresponding to has the form where .

\begin{proof} ii)iii) is trivial.

iii)i) Note that , and we know is an -module. Since is simple, . Let be a field extension. We aim to show is a simple -module. Since , there is

Note that acts on by , where . As is simple as an -module, we know is simple as an -module. By the arbitrary of , is absolutely irreducible.

i)ii) is omitted. \end{proof}

Group Representations

Lemma

A morphism in is an isomorphism iff the morphism is an isomorphism in .

Definition

Two representations and on the same object are isomorphic if there exists automorphism of such that for all .

Remark. We say and are uniformly conjugate.

Let and be -representations of , where is a category. Then group acts on the set by . Compose it with diagonal morphism

Define an action of on , for all , and it induces the following commutative diagram.

Lemma

The set of morphisms in is the set of fixed points of in its action on .

Definition

The fixator (stabilizer) of in is subgroup .

Lemma

Let be a -representation of .

  • if is an isomorphism of representations, then for all .

\begin{proof}

  • Exercise \end{proof}