Let be an algebra over a commutative ring , and let be an -module. If is a homomorphism to another commutative ring , we form the -algebra , and becomes an -module.
- If is a subring of , we say that the module is obtained from by extending the scalar form to .
- If an -module has the form , we say that is written in .
- When is free as an -module, we can identify with , and an -basis of becomes an -basis of .
- If with an ideal , applying to an -module is the same as reducing modulo .
- If is an -module of the form for some -module , then we say can be lifted to and is a lift of .
Proposition
Let be fields where is algebraic over , and let be a finite-dimensional -algebra. Let be a finitely-dimensional -module. Then there exists a field with of finite degree over so that is written in .
\begin{proof}
Let be an -basis of , and let acts with matrix w.r.t. some -basis of . Then and . Note that acts on by matrices over the field .
To show is written in , it suffices to find a -module such that .
Define . Since acts on by matrices over the field , we know and so is a -module.
Since is a set of -basis of , has -basis . Define
then is an isomorphism between -vector spaces. Furthermore, notice that
and so is an morphism between -modules.
\end{proof}
Definition
Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra where is a field. A simple -module is said to be absolutely simple if is simple as an -module for all extension field of .
Definition
We say an extension field of is a splitting field of if every simple -module is absolutely irreducible.
Proposition
Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra over field , and let be a simple -module. TFAE:
- is absolutely irreducible;
- ;
- The matrix algebra summand of corresponding to has the form where .
\begin{proof}
ii)→iii) is trivial.
iii)→i) Note that , and we know is an -module. Since is simple, . Let be a field extension. We aim to show is a simple -module. Since , there is
Note that acts on by , where . As is simple as an -module, we know is simple as an -module. By the arbitrary of , is absolutely irreducible.
i)→ii) is omitted.
\end{proof}
Group Representations
Lemma
A morphism in is an isomorphism iff the morphism is an isomorphism in .
Definition
Two representations and on the same object are isomorphic if there exists automorphism of such that for all .
Remark. We say and are uniformly conjugate.
Let and be -representations of , where is a category. Then group acts on the set by . Compose it with diagonal morphism
Define an action of on , for all , and it induces the following commutative diagram.

Lemma
The set of morphisms in is the set of fixed points of in its action on .
Definition
The fixator (stabilizer) of in is subgroup .
Lemma
Let be a -representation of .
- if is an isomorphism of representations, then for all .
\begin{proof}
- Exercise
\end{proof}