Radical of Modules

maximal submodule

A maximal submodule of is a proper submodule satisfying implies or . Equivalently, is simple.

Definition

Define . If does not have maximal submodules, then define .

Lemma

Let be a proper -submodule of . If is finitely generated over , then there exists a maximal -submodule of containing . In particular, if is finitely generated, then there exists a maximal submodule of containing .

\begin{proof} See ^fbacdf. \end{proof}

Corollary

For every proper left ideal of , there exists a maximal left ideal of containing .

Lemma

Let be finitely generated -modules, and let be -morphism.

  • .
  • If is an epimorphism with , then .

\begin{proof} See ^27mw0t. \end{proof}

Lemma

Let be an -module.

  • Suppose that are maximal submodules of . Then there is a subset such that

  • Suppose that is Artinian, then is a semisimple and is the unique smallest submodule of with semisimple quotient.

\begin{proof} See ^r8oe32. \end{proof}

Nakayama lemma

Nakayama's lemma

Let be Noetherian(or finitely generated). Then is essential. Equivalently, if is a submodule of with , then .

\begin{proof} See ^3f1b99. \end{proof}

Proposition

  • Suppose that and are -morphisms of -modules. If two of are essential, then so is the third.
  • Let be a homomorphism of Noetherian modules. Then is an essential epimorphism iff the radical quotient is an essential epimorphism. In fact, if it holds, then the radical quotient is an isomorphism.
  • Let be homomorphisms of Noetherian modules for , then are all essential epimorphisms iff is an essential epimorphism.

\begin{proof} See ^q7sonb. \end{proof}

Corollary

If and are projective Noetherian modules over a ring, then iff .

\begin{proof} See ^9ry2ru. \end{proof}

Semisimple

Definition

A ring with identity is called semisimple if is semisimple as a left -modules.

Remark. is called (left) regular module.

Theorem

TFAE for an Artinian ring .

  • is a semisimple Artinian ring.
  • Every -module is semisimple.

\begin{proof} See ^7dokb6. \end{proof}

Some Isomorphisms

Lemma

Let be a left -module. Then .

\begin{proof} See ^cj265g \end{proof}

Corollary

For any ring with identity, one has as rings.

\begin{proof} See ^5830df \end{proof}

Lemma

Let be a ring, and let be the set of all square matrices of degree over . Then .

\begin{proof} See ^hvg28s. \end{proof}

Artin–Wedderburn

Let be a semisimple Artinian ring with identity. Then is a direct sum of matrix rings over division rings. Specifically, if where are non-isomorphic simple modules occurring with multiplications , then where .

\begin{proof} See ^f43ojz. \end{proof}

Simple Modules

Definition

A ring is called simple if it has no ideal other than and .

Example. is a simple ring if is a division ring.

Notice that

and each part is a simple left -module.

Algebras

Definition

Let be a commutative ring with identity, and let be a ring with identity. We call an -algebra if is an -module such that for any and any . Equivalently, there is a ring homomorphism such that the image of lies in the center of .

Moreover, if is a field and is a finite-dimensional over , then we shall say that the algebra is finite-dimensional, which is both Noetherian and Artinian.

Examples.

  • Suppose is a commutative ring with identity and is a finite group. Define group algebra/group ring as , which is a free -module with basis , then is a -algebra.
  • For a field , the polynomial ring is a -algebra.
  • For a commutative ring , is a -algebra, where .

Schur

Let be a -algebra, where is a field. Let be a simple -module. Then is a division ring, which is a -algebra.

If is finite dimensional over , so is .

Furthermore, if is finite dimensional and is algebraically closed, then .

\begin{proof} See ^evw7zf. \end{proof}