1. Prove: Let be a finite group and a prime. Each element can be uniquely written where is -regular, is -singular, and . If is such a decomposition of an element that is conjugate to , then is conjugate to , and is conjugate to .
\begin{proof}
Assume that with . By Bezout’s theorem, there exist integers such that . Then we have . Define and , then . Thus , is a power of , and . Now we proved that such decomposition exists. For any decomposition satisfying the conditions above, we have as . Let , and let . Then there exist integer such that . It deduces that and . Also note that and . Hence . If such decomposition is not unique, that is, there exists , then . Since , they commute and so is both -regular and -singular, which yields that , , and , contradiction.
If is such a decomposition of an element that is conjugate to , then there exists such that . Then . Since , there is . Also and . Hence is a decomposition of and by uniqueness there is , , i.e., is conjugate to , and is conjugate to .
\end{proof}
2. Find the complete list of subgroups of the dihedral group of order 8 such that the 2-dimensional simple representation over can be written for some 1-dimensional representation of .
\begin{proof}
Recall that
Let be a -module with character , then with the convention that if .
Link to original
If a -dimensional representation over of can be written as for some 1-dimensional representation of , then and so . Assume that , then all possibilities of are , , and .
The character table of is
and the character table of is
Notice that
- for all .
Remark that the conjugacy classes of are
Then one can check . Hence is irreducible. Similarly, we can compute that is irreducible whenever or . Therefore, the complete list of subgroups is where .
\end{proof}
3. Determine all simple -modules for
- (i) and is the field of 3 elements.
- (ii) and is a field of (with ) elements.
\begin{proof}
i) Since is the field of elements, there is and so .
We claim that is a splitting field for . Recall thats the trivial representation of is the unique irreducible -module, so the number of simple -module equals the number of simple -module. Since and contains -th root of unity, by ^ci9c9b we know is splitting for . Now we prove the claim.
Notice that the conjugacy classes of are and , so has two simple -modules by ^z05r54. Thus, also has two simple -modules.
Consider -dimensional -modules. For each simple -module with dimension , it corresponds to a group homomorphism , whose kernel contains . So it suffices to consider the group homomorphism . Since , there exist two group homomorphism from to , and each of them induces a group homomorphism from to , that is,
As and each of them induces a -dimensional simple -module (defined by for any ), we get all simple -modules.
ii) Now we assume that with , so . Since is a Sylow -subgroup, there is and so the number of simple -module equals the number of simple -module. Since and for any , one can check is a splitting field for when is even. So we divide the problem into two parts.
Firstly, when is even, is a splitting field for . Then has three conjugacy classes and so has three simple -modules by ^z05r54. Furthermore, note that there are three group homomorphisms from to , that is,
Then we can get all simple -modules by the similar argument in i), and all of them are dimension .
Now we assume that is odd. It suffices to find simple module of over . As , the group algebra is semisimple.
The group algebra is isomorphic to . Since , there is and . It deduces that
Note that is a -dimensional module where the generator of acts as and , so it is a trivial module. Similarly, since is irreducible, is a simple -dimensional module where the generator of acts as , and the corresponding matrix representation is
Therefore, the -dimensional simple -module corresponds the following representation
Since and is semisimple, there are two simple -modules as above.
\end{proof}