Exercise 2
1. If are measures and , then is a measure.
\begin{proof}
Let . Since are measures and , for any , and . Then .
For any pairwise disjoint , we have that . Then
Therefore, is a measure.
\end{proof}
2. Let be a measure space and .
- i) Show that .
- ii) Assume that there exists with such that for . Show that .
\begin{proof}
i) For any subsequence satisfying , we aim to show . If it is true, then any limit point of is greater than or equal to and so . Note that , so we only need to prove . Define , and it is equivalent to show .
For any , let . For any , there is and so . Take , then for any . Take , then , that is, .
ii) Similarly, note that for any subsequence . To show any limit point of is less than or equal to , it suffices to show . Define , then we only need to show .
For any , let . For any , there is and so . Take , then for any . Since with , take , then , that is, .
\end{proof}
3. If is a measure space and , then .
\begin{proof}
Since and , we have that
So we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
4. Let be a -algebra on . Let be a finite additive set function. Show that if is a family of disjoint subsets in then
\begin{proof}
Since is a finite additive set function, then for any , there is . Let . Since is a -algebra, then . Then for any . Take , then .
\end{proof}
5. Let be a probability space and be a sequence of sets such that . Show that .
\begin{proof}
As for all , then for all . It follows that
Therefore, .
\end{proof}
8. Assume that are measurable subsets of the measure space with the property that for . Show that
\begin{proof}
Since are measurable subsets, then for all . It yields that
Repeat the procedure above, then we have that . Since , then . Take , there is
On the other hand, and so . Take , there is
Therefore, .
\end{proof}
9. Let be a measurable space and assume that finitely additive and -subadditive. Show that is -additive.
\begin{proof}
Note that for a family which is pairwise disjoint, there is
Since
then take and . Therefore, , that is, is -additive.
\end{proof}
10. Let be a finite measure space and . Prove that is a -algebra of subsets of .
\begin{proof}
Since and , then . For any , if , then ; if , then . It yields that if . For , if for all , then ; otherwise, there is a , and . Thus for any , . Therefore, is a -algebra.
\end{proof}
11. Let be an algebra of subsets of a nonnegative set function on such that , and . Prove:
- (a) is an algebra of subsets of .
- (b) The restriction of to is finitely additive,
- (c) If are pairwise disjoint and , then .
\begin{proof}
(a) Note that for all . It yields that . For any ,
for all and so . Let . Notice that
Therefore, . For , we have that , . That is, . Hence, is an algebra.
(b) For any pairwise disjoint family , we have that
Therefore, is finitely additive.
(c) Since are pairwise disjoint, then
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
12. Let be a finite measure space and a positive, finitely additive set function on . Prove that if for any sequence with we have , then is a measure on .
\begin{proof}
Let for all . Then and as . Thus for a constant and yield that . Hence . For a pairwise disjoint , define and . Since is finitely additive, we have that . Since be a finite measure space, then and by . It follows that . Note that , so we have that , that is, . Therefore, we prove that for any pairwise disjoint , and so is a measure on .
\end{proof}
13. Let be a measure space and a mapping from onto . Prove that is a -algebra of subsets of and that the set function on given by is a measure, called the measure induced by .
\begin{proof}
i) Since and , then . For any , and so . For , we have that and so . Therefore, is a -algebra.
ii) Note that . For any pairwise disjoint , are also pairwise disjoint and $$ \nu(\cup_{i=1}^\infty B_i)=\mu(T^{-1}(\cup_{i=1}^\infty B_i))=\mu(\cup_{i=1}^\infty T^{-1}(B_i))=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\mu(T^{-1}(B_i))=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\nu(B_i).
Therefore, $\nu$ is a measure. `\end{proof}`