Definition
Let be a field. A discrete valuation on is a map such that
- ;
- (non-Archimedean valuation)
(Sometimes define .)
Definition
Let which contains , then is a ring, which is called the valuation ring of . It is a local ring with .
\begin{proof}
It is trivial to show is a ring. To see it is local with the unique maximal ideal , it suffices to check is a unit. But in this case iff and so .
\end{proof}
Remark. Given a valuation as above, one can check with a fixed element defines a norm in . That is to say, is a distance. To show it, it suffices to show it satisfies the triangle inequality.
“在这个世界里,所有的三角形都是等腰三角形。”
Examples.
- -adic valuation on .
-
Fix a prime , let with . Define
-
To see it is a valuation, it suffices to check .
-
Suppose and , then
-
For general case, multiply to and for a large enough . Then we get back to the first case.
-
-
For on , the valuation ring is , whose unique maximal ideal is and residue field is .
-
- is a field.
- Take an irreducible polynomial . Then we define . For , let .
- It is valuation, similar to on .
Remark. Valuation ring and ED are different, as a norm function does not satisfies .
Definition
We say an integral is a DVR (discrete valuation ring) if there exists a discrete valuation such that is a valuation ring.
Fact. DVR is a PID. It is also proved in ^bb0319.
- Since is surjective, there exists such that (such is called a uniformizer).
- Claim 1: the unique maximal ideal is .
- Indeed, given any , notice that iff . Then and . Thus and yield .
- Claim 2: given any ideal , for some .
- Let . There exists such that . Then and .
- For any , we have and . Thus for all and .
- Now we prove that .
- Claim 1: the unique maximal ideal is .
Proposition
Let be a Noetherian local domain with dimension . Let be the maximal ideal of , and let . TFAE:
- is a DVR;
- is integral closed;
- is a principal ideal;
- ;
- any nonzero ideal of is a power of ;
- there exists such that any non-zero ideal is of form with .
\begin{proof}
We starts with facts on .
- Fact A: for ideal such that , then is -primary and for some .
- proof. Since and is a domain, we know the only primes of are . Hence . By ^s2eg5f is -primary and .
- Fact B: for all .
- proof. Otherwise is Artinian local and so by ^myy86x, which is impossible.
i)→ii) See here.
ii)→iii) Choose any nonzero . By Fact A, there exists such that and . Pick some such that . Let . We aim to show is a “uniformizer”, that is, . Note , then is not integral over by integral closed. Claim as subsets of . (Remark that we don’t know whether .) If , then and iii) holds.
Now we prove the claim. Notice that , because for any , . Also note that is an ideal of . So it remains to prove . Suppose otherwise , then this defines an -module structure on . This is a faithful -module, because all multiplications happen inside . By ^jy6o7s, is integral over , leading to a contradiction. Now we proved the claim.
iii)→iv) Assume , then . Then as a -dimensional vector space.
iv)→v) For , by Fact A for some . Consider , which is a Noetherian local ring with dimension . Hence is Artinian. By ^f166vm is principal and so . Hence .
v)→vi) By Fact B, , then there exists . Since for some , we have and .
vi)→i) By vi), . By Fact B, . Now for any , with a unique . Now define . It is easy to check is a valuation.
\end{proof}