Definition

Let be a field. A discrete valuation on is a map such that

  • ;
  • (non-Archimedean valuation)

(Sometimes define .)

Definition

Let which contains , then is a ring, which is called the valuation ring of . It is a local ring with .

\begin{proof} It is trivial to show is a ring. To see it is local with the unique maximal ideal , it suffices to check is a unit. But in this case iff and so . \end{proof}

Remark. Given a valuation as above, one can check with a fixed element defines a norm in . That is to say, is a distance. To show it, it suffices to show it satisfies the triangle inequality.

“在这个世界里,所有的三角形都是等腰三角形。”

For a triangle , we have

if . See here.

Examples.

  • -adic valuation on .
    • Fix a prime , let with . Define

    • To see it is a valuation, it suffices to check .

      • Suppose and , then

      • For general case, multiply to and for a large enough . Then we get back to the first case.

    • For on , the valuation ring is , whose unique maximal ideal is and residue field is .

  • is a field.
    • Take an irreducible polynomial . Then we define . For , let .
    • It is valuation, similar to on .

Remark. Valuation ring and ED are different, as a norm function does not satisfies .

Definition

We say an integral is a DVR (discrete valuation ring) if there exists a discrete valuation such that is a valuation ring.

Fact. DVR is a PID. It is also proved in ^bb0319.

  • Since is surjective, there exists such that (such is called a uniformizer).
    • Claim 1: the unique maximal ideal is .
      • Indeed, given any , notice that iff . Then and . Thus and yield .
    • Claim 2: given any ideal , for some .
      • Let . There exists such that . Then and .
      • For any , we have and . Thus for all and .
      • Now we prove that .

Proposition

Let be a Noetherian local domain with dimension . Let be the maximal ideal of , and let . TFAE:

  • is a DVR;
  • is integral closed;
  • is a principal ideal;
  • ;
  • any nonzero ideal of is a power of ;
  • there exists such that any non-zero ideal is of form with .

\begin{proof} We starts with facts on .

  • Fact A: for ideal such that , then is -primary and for some .
    • proof. Since and is a domain, we know the only primes of are . Hence . By ^s2eg5f is -primary and .
  • Fact B: for all .
    • proof. Otherwise is Artinian local and so by ^myy86x, which is impossible.

i)ii) See here.

ii)iii) Choose any nonzero . By Fact A, there exists such that and . Pick some such that . Let . We aim to show is a “uniformizer”, that is, . Note , then is not integral over by integral closed. Claim as subsets of . (Remark that we don’t know whether .) If , then and iii) holds.

Now we prove the claim. Notice that , because for any , . Also note that is an ideal of . So it remains to prove . Suppose otherwise , then this defines an -module structure on . This is a faithful -module, because all multiplications happen inside . By ^jy6o7s, is integral over , leading to a contradiction. Now we proved the claim.

iii)iv) Assume , then . Then as a -dimensional vector space.

iv)v) For , by Fact A for some . Consider , which is a Noetherian local ring with dimension . Hence is Artinian. By ^f166vm is principal and so . Hence .

v)vi) By Fact B, , then there exists . Since for some , we have and .

vi)i) By vi), . By Fact B, . Now for any , with a unique . Now define . It is easy to check is a valuation. \end{proof}