1. Show that is for of complex type, for of real type, and for of quaternionic type.

\begin{proof} Assume that be of real type, then where is an absolutely irreducible -module. Assume that is the corresponding representation of , then by absolutely irreducible. Assume that , then . It deduces that

Assume that is not of real type, then is irreducible over and so is a division ring. Recall that

Let be a finite dimensional vector space over . If there exists a multiplication such that is a division ring, then is , or .

Hence . Define , then and . Hence, .

Using the argument in exercise 2, if is of quaternionic type, there exists a linear transformation over such that and . Hence and so .

Assume that is of complex type. If , since , there exists such that and . Define . Since , is a bilinear form of , which is a contradiction. \end{proof}

2. Show that is of real type if and only if is the complexification of a representation over the field of real numbers.

\begin{proof} Assume that is the complexification of a representation over the field of real numbers, then there exists a basis of such that the matrix of with respect to this basis has real entries. Let be a set of basis of , then there exists a positive definite symmetric -bilinear form as with . Then define as

where , , and . It is easy to verify is a symmetric bilinear form on and is real-valued. Thus, is of real type.

Conversely, assume that is of real type, then is real-valued and there exists a symmetric bilinear form on preserved by .

Define . Note that

then is an isomorphism of modules. Let be a positive definite non-degenerated Hermitian form. Define for all , then is -invariant. Furthermore, define

and , then is -invariant, and it satisfies that and for all . Thus, is an isomorphism of real vector spaces. Consider . Since is an isomorphism of vector space and , by Schur’s lemma for some .

Using the definition of , we have that

which deduces

and . Define , then is a isomorphism of real vector spaces and . Hence, is a sum of real eigenspaces and corresponding to eigenvalues and . Finally, yields that and so . \end{proof}

3. Show that any nontrivial finite group of odd order has an irreducible representation which is not defined over .

\begin{proof} Assume that is a nontrivial group of odd order and is a nontrivial irreducible character. Since is odd, the map is injective. It follows that

where is the trivial representation of . Note that as is irreducible, then is not real-valued.

Let be the corresponding representation of . There exists such that is complex and so the sum of eigenvalues of is complex. It deduces that can not be defined over . \end{proof}

4. Let denote the dihedral group with ten elements which has presentation

Identify the subgroup generated by with .

  • a) Find the characters values of for the one-dimensional representations of defined by . Which of these induced characters are irreducible?
  • b) Use part a) to determine the character table of .
  • c) Calculate the Frobenius-Schur indicator for each irreducible character. For the real-valued characters find -invariant bilinear forms on the representation spaces.

\begin{proof} a) The conjugacy classes of are

Assume that is a representation of , and assume that is the corresponding induced representation. Then , , and . Thus the characters values of are

Note that , are irreducible for .

ii) By i) there are two irreducible -dimensional representation. Then has two irreducible -dimensional representation by , and one of them is the trivial one.

By Schur’s orthogonality relations satisfy that , and . Therefore, and .

iii) The Frobenius-Schur indicators of are for , as they are all real-valued.

When , it is easy to verify is a -invariant bilinear form. When , define for and define . It deduces that and . So is the -invariant bilinear form. \end{proof}

5. By the theorem on Frobenius-Schur indicator, any self-dual simple -module possesses a unique (up to scalar) non-zero -invariant bilinear form. Prove that this form is non-degenerate, that is, for all implies that .

\begin{proof} Assume that for all , then it follows that for all . Since is a simple module, and so for any , for all . It yields that is zero, contradiction. Therefore, is non-degenerate. \end{proof}

6. Consider as a natural subgroup of . Find the irreducible decomposition of the restriction for each irreducible character of .

\begin{proof} The irreducible character table of is

11111
11-11-1
220-10
3-1-101
3-110-1

Then the restriction for each irreducible character are

111
1-11
20-1
3-10
310

Note that are irreducible for , and , . \end{proof}

7. Suppose that a finite group has a left action on a finite set , and obtain a linear representation of of degree by identifying with the basis elements of a vector space.

  • a) Show that if is the character of then the value takes on an arbitrary equals the number of such that .
  • b) Show that the inner product of and the trivial character of is equal to , where is the index of the subgroup in .

\begin{proof} a) Assume that . For any , if , then and so . Therefore, the value takes on an arbitrary equals the number of such that .

b) The inner product of and the trivial character of is

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

8. Let be a complete list of irreducible representations of a group and let be their respective characters.

  • a) Show that for any element such that the following identity holds .
  • b) An element is called an involution if . Show that the number of involutions in the group coincides with .
  • c) Hence show that the number of involutions in equals the difference , where is the set of -modules of symmetric type and is the set of -modules of skew-symmetric type.

\begin{proof} a) By Schur’s orthogonality relations, for any . Take and , then we get .

b) If , then by a). If , then where is the conjugacy class and . Therefore, for any . Hence,

c) By Frobenius-Schur indicator, if , and if . Thus there is

and so we finish the proof. \end{proof}

9. Check that if are groups and if is a representation of , then

\begin{proof} Assume that , , and . Then we have

Recall that is a -module with respect to the action . By ^hp5t8s,

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

10. Compute the decomposition into irreducible modules of all the representations of induced from the irreducible representations of and .

I find a solution of 10: see here. The character table of is not easy to find, in fact, it is obtained from the induced representation of .

\begin{proof}

We compute the irreducible representations of , and .

i) Let and , then all irreducible representations of are determined by where and denote the corresponding characters as . The induced characters are and the values are

120022
1200
1200
1200
1200

where .

ii) Recall the character table of is

Class size1443
1111
11
11
300-1

where . Then the induces characters are

52100
5-1100
5-1100
150-100

and are irreducible.

Remark. “We claim by pure thought that their inductions must be irreducible!”: See here.

  • If is reducible with , then it must contain a trivial representation.
  • By 9 Frobenius Reciprocity, the multiplicity of the trivial representation of in is the same as that of in the trivial representation of , and so this multiplicity is zero if .

iii) Now the character table of can be written as

Class size120151212
11111
30XYZ
30X’Y’Z’
410-1-1
5-1100

and we need to find and . By Schur orthogonality relations, we can solve that and and with , .

Note that and are conjugate for all , then we know . Then we can solve that and and the character table of is completed, that is

Class size120151212
11111
30-1
30-1
410-1-1
5-1100

iv) Let , then the character table of is

1111
11-1-1
1-11-1
1-1-11

and the induced characters are

150300
150-100
150-100
150-100

And the decomposition is easy to compute. \end{proof}

11. Let be a finite group and its subgroup. If is a representation of and a representation of , show that (with all tensor products over )

In particular, , where is the permutation representation of on .

\begin{proof}

Error

Assume that , then

and with we have

Hence, it suffices to show . Define where and are bases of and , respectively. For any , and . Unfortunately, they are not equal and this method fails.

Let be the character of , and let be the character of . To show , it suffices to show for any irreducible character there is .

Note that by Frobenius reciprocity, there is

and so we finish the proof. \end{proof}

12. Let be a finite group and its subgroup. If is a conjugacy class of , and decomposes into conjugacy classes of , then the character formula for induced representation can be rewritten as the value of the character of on is

\begin{proof} Note that

and we finish the proof. \end{proof}