1. Show that is for of complex type, for of real type, and for of quaternionic type.
\begin{proof}
Assume that be of real type, then where is an absolutely irreducible -module. Assume that is the corresponding representation of , then by absolutely irreducible. Assume that , then . It deduces that
Assume that is not of real type, then is irreducible over and so is a division ring. Recall that
Let be a finite dimensional vector space over . If there exists a multiplication such that is a division ring, then is , or .
Hence . Define , then and . Hence, .
Using the argument in exercise 2, if is of quaternionic type, there exists a linear transformation over such that and . Hence and so .
Assume that is of complex type. If , since , there exists such that and . Define . Since , is a bilinear form of , which is a contradiction.
\end{proof}
2. Show that is of real type if and only if is the complexification of a representation over the field of real numbers.
\begin{proof}
Assume that is the complexification of a representation over the field of real numbers, then there exists a basis of such that the matrix of with respect to this basis has real entries. Let be a set of basis of , then there exists a positive definite symmetric -bilinear form as with . Then define as
where , , and . It is easy to verify is a symmetric bilinear form on and is real-valued. Thus, is of real type.
Conversely, assume that is of real type, then is real-valued and there exists a symmetric bilinear form on preserved by .
Define . Note that
then is an isomorphism of modules. Let be a positive definite non-degenerated Hermitian form. Define for all , then is -invariant. Furthermore, define
and , then is -invariant, and it satisfies that and for all . Thus, is an isomorphism of real vector spaces. Consider . Since is an isomorphism of vector space and , by Schur’s lemma for some .
Using the definition of , we have that
which deduces
and . Define , then is a isomorphism of real vector spaces and . Hence, is a sum of real eigenspaces and corresponding to eigenvalues and . Finally, yields that and so .
\end{proof}
3. Show that any nontrivial finite group of odd order has an irreducible representation which is not defined over .
\begin{proof}
Assume that is a nontrivial group of odd order and is a nontrivial irreducible character. Since is odd, the map is injective. It follows that
where is the trivial representation of . Note that as is irreducible, then is not real-valued.
Let be the corresponding representation of . There exists such that is complex and so the sum of eigenvalues of is complex. It deduces that can not be defined over .
\end{proof}
4. Let denote the dihedral group with ten elements which has presentation
Identify the subgroup generated by with .
- a) Find the characters values of for the one-dimensional representations of defined by . Which of these induced characters are irreducible?
- b) Use part a) to determine the character table of .
- c) Calculate the Frobenius-Schur indicator for each irreducible character. For the real-valued characters find -invariant bilinear forms on the representation spaces.
\begin{proof}
a) The conjugacy classes of are
Assume that is a representation of , and assume that is the corresponding induced representation. Then , , and . Thus the characters values of are
Note that , are irreducible for .
ii) By i) there are two irreducible -dimensional representation. Then has two irreducible -dimensional representation by , and one of them is the trivial one.
By Schur’s orthogonality relations satisfy that , and . Therefore, and .
iii) The Frobenius-Schur indicators of are for , as they are all real-valued.
When , it is easy to verify is a -invariant bilinear form. When , define for and define . It deduces that and . So is the -invariant bilinear form.
\end{proof}
5. By the theorem on Frobenius-Schur indicator, any self-dual simple -module possesses a unique (up to scalar) non-zero -invariant bilinear form. Prove that this form is non-degenerate, that is, for all implies that .
\begin{proof}
Assume that for all , then it follows that for all . Since is a simple module, and so for any , for all . It yields that is zero, contradiction. Therefore, is non-degenerate.
\end{proof}
6. Consider as a natural subgroup of . Find the irreducible decomposition of the restriction for each irreducible character of .
\begin{proof}
The irreducible character table of is
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | |
| 3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
Then the restriction for each irreducible character are
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | -1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | -1 | |
| 3 | -1 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 |
Note that are irreducible for , and , .
\end{proof}
7. Suppose that a finite group has a left action on a finite set , and obtain a linear representation of of degree by identifying with the basis elements of a vector space.
- a) Show that if is the character of then the value takes on an arbitrary equals the number of such that .
- b) Show that the inner product of and the trivial character of is equal to , where is the index of the subgroup in .
\begin{proof}
a) Assume that . For any , if , then and so . Therefore, the value takes on an arbitrary equals the number of such that .
b) The inner product of and the trivial character of is
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
8. Let be a complete list of irreducible representations of a group and let be their respective characters.
- a) Show that for any element such that the following identity holds .
- b) An element is called an involution if . Show that the number of involutions in the group coincides with .
- c) Hence show that the number of involutions in equals the difference , where is the set of -modules of symmetric type and is the set of -modules of skew-symmetric type.
\begin{proof}
a) By Schur’s orthogonality relations, for any . Take and , then we get .
b) If , then by a). If , then where is the conjugacy class and . Therefore, for any . Hence,
c) By Frobenius-Schur indicator, if , and if . Thus there is
and so we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
9. Check that if are groups and if is a representation of , then
\begin{proof}
Assume that , , and . Then we have
Recall that is a -module with respect to the action . By ^hp5t8s,
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
10. Compute the decomposition into irreducible modules of all the representations of induced from the irreducible representations of and .
I find a solution of 10: see here. The character table of is not easy to find, in fact, it is obtained from the induced representation of .
\begin{proof}
We compute the irreducible representations of , and .
i) Let and , then all irreducible representations of are determined by where and denote the corresponding characters as . The induced characters are and the values are
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | 0 | 0 |
where .
ii) Recall the character table of is
| Class size | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 1 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
where . Then the induces characters are
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
and are irreducible.
Remark. “We claim by pure thought that their inductions must be irreducible!”: See here.
- If is reducible with , then it must contain a trivial representation.
- By 9 Frobenius Reciprocity, the multiplicity of the trivial representation of in is the same as that of in the trivial representation of , and so this multiplicity is zero if .
iii) Now the character table of can be written as
| Class size | 1 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 12 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | X | Y | Z | |
| 3 | 0 | X’ | Y’ | Z’ | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
and we need to find and . By Schur orthogonality relations, we can solve that and and with , .
Note that and are conjugate for all , then we know . Then we can solve that and and the character table of is completed, that is
| Class size | 1 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 12 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | -1 | |||
| 3 | 0 | -1 | |||
| 4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -1 | |
| 5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
iv) Let , then the character table of is
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | |
| 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | |
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
and the induced characters are
| 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
And the decomposition is easy to compute.
\end{proof}
11. Let be a finite group and its subgroup. If is a representation of and a representation of , show that (with all tensor products over )
In particular, , where is the permutation representation of on .
\begin{proof}
Error
Assume that , then
and with we have
Hence, it suffices to show . Define where and are bases of and , respectively. For any , and . Unfortunately, they are not equal and this method fails.
Let be the character of , and let be the character of . To show , it suffices to show for any irreducible character there is .
Note that by Frobenius reciprocity, there is
and so we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
12. Let be a finite group and its subgroup. If is a conjugacy class of , and decomposes into conjugacy classes of , then the character formula for induced representation can be rewritten as the value of the character of on is
\begin{proof}
Note that
and we finish the proof.
\end{proof}