Our goal is to consider the classification of prime Jordan algebras, with a particular interest in the infinite-dimensional case.

According to the structure theory, the classification naturally divides into two branches based on , the variety generated by special Jordan algebras.

  • The i-Special Case ( )
    • This variety is characterized by the set of all polynomial identities that hold for special Jordan algebras (s-identities), such as Glennie’s identity.
    • We show that such algebras fall into
      • the Hermitian type , or
      • the quadratic type .
  • The i-Exceptional Case ( )

This section is organized as follows.

  • the Polynomial Identity f and Simple Classification finishes the classification of finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebras.
    • Define
    • (capacity ≥ 3) If , then
    • If , then either
      • (capacity = 1) , or
      • (capacity = 2) .
  • Radical and Speciality gives a criteria of special Jordan algebra in the form of .
    • Remark that each Jordan algebra is a quotient of , but here we only consider the quotient of for computational convenience.
    • If such Jordan algebra is prime, i.e. , then it is special.
    • Furthermore, without proof, a prime Jordan algebra is i-special iff it is special.
    • Therefore, in the following sections, we focus on the classification of Prime Special Jordan Algebras.
  • Central Localization of Prime Special PI Jordan Algebras is a reduction from prime PI to finite dimensional simple.
    • It uses the similar method of Posner, that is why we assume PI. (For non-PI case, and they are wild.)
    • We can get finite dimensional simple Jordan algebra from prime PI Jordan algebra via central localization.
    • Therefore, by Classification of JNW, a prime special Jordan PI-algebra can be classified as
      • satisfies , and so is a finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebra satisfying .
  • [[#structure-of-prime-pi-jordan-algebras-satisfying-f0|Structure of Prime PI Jordan Algebras Satisfying ]] divide the prime Jordan algebra with into two parts
    • if , then ;
    • if , then is associative.

the Polynomial Identity  and Simple Classification

Let be a set of variables. Take , then is a Jordan element in . There exists a non-associative polynomial such that . Define .

Recall that we have proved the following theorem.

Transclude of 9-Speciality-and-Exceptionality#^8z1x2m

In this subsection, we consider the later case.

Lemma

Let be a simple finite-dimensional Jordan algebra (over ), and satisfies . Then is either or is a Jordan algebra of bilinear form.

\begin{proof} Assume that . For , . There exists some element such that in , leading to a contradiction. Hence .

By 7 Capacity of Jordan Algebras ≤ 2, when , ; when , .
\end{proof}

Radical and Speciality

In this subsection, we aim to prove that

Let . If , then is special.

Link to original

Recall that homomorphic image of is special, and .

Lemma

Let . For any , .

\begin{proof} Take . Since , it can be written as , where are monomials in .

By ^1k683q, there is . Define , then

Take . By , we know and so . Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Corollary

.

Lemma

Let be a special Jordan algebra, and let be an associative algebra. Assume that and . If and , then .

\begin{proof} WLOG we may assume that and prove that . (Otherwise take and .) Let . Then . Consider . For any , .

Since , we have and so . In associative algebra we have

It follows that

Since and , there is . Since , is annihilates -sequence and . It yields that . As and , we have for any .

Define . We prove that . To prove that, it is enough to prove that and are ideals in . For any and , . Since generates , we have . Thus is an ideal and so is an ideal of . Since is semisimple, and so . \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be a special Jordan algebra, with and . Then .

\begin{proof} Define , then and . Let with . By ^786164, and so . Hence is semi-prime and . It follows that and so .

The other inclusion: let , and let be any -sequence in which contains . Since and , we know is a -sequence in and so . Then it contains and .

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let . If , then is special.

\begin{proof} Define . Then by ^eh49pd and so .

Note that

Since , we have

Let , then by ^b8ac58 and

On the other hand, since , we have in . Thus . Combining this with the previous inclusion, we get

and

Therefore, is special. \end{proof}

Remark. Although ^vtiqhh is stated for algebras in the form of , the conclusion holds generally for . For any i-special Jordan algebra (i.e., ), if is prime, then is special. Specifically, Cohn’s examples, which are i-special but not special, are known to be not prime.

Central Localization of Prime Special PI Jordan Algebras

For associative prime PI-algebra, its central localization is central simple.

Posner

Let be an associative prime PI-algebra over with center and let . Then is -algebra, which is central simple and of finite dimension.

In fact, for a prime special PI Jordan algebra, we can use the generalized Posner theorem and get a finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebra via central Localization. Then by Classification of JNW, we have the following conclusions.

  • If , then is of Hermitian type (^5pmm0t);
  • If , then is a field or quadratic (^boupap).

Theorem

Let be an associative algebra with involution. Assume that is a prime PI Jordan algebra. Then , is a simple algebra over field , and dimension of over is finite.

Lemma

Let be a prime Jordan algebra generated by three elements. Suppose and satisfies , where

Then . Moreover, is of finite dimension over and or is a Clifford algebra.

\begin{proof} Since is generated by three elements (variables in ), we can write .

By Cohn’s Theorem, for , the free special Jordan algebra coincides with the symmetric elements of the free associative algebra, i.e., . Thus, .

Since is prime, we have . By ^vtiqhh, we conclude that is special.

Since is special and prime, it satisfies the condition of the analog of Posner’s Theorem. This implies that is a finite-dimensional central simple algebra over the field .

Since satisfies the identity , its localization also satisfies . Recall the classification of finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebras: if a simple algebra satisfies (i.e., degree ), it must be either:

  • Degree 1: ; or
  • Degree 2: is a Jordan algebra of a bilinear form (Clifford type).

This completes the proof. \end{proof}

Structure of Prime PI Jordan Algebras Satisfying 

Let be the variety generated by special Jordan algebras. The following lemma is a “local global principle”.

Lemma

Let satisfying . Then

\begin{proof} Let , then clearly .  To show the other inclusion , it is enough to show that for any and

It is equivalent to showing that is an ideal in

We will assume that (finitely generated).  Consider the quotient by the nil radical

where each is a prime Jordan algebra. Since satisfies , each component also satisfies

By ^boupap, for each , the center , and the localization is a simple finite-dimensional algebra over the field . Specifically, is either the field itself or a Clifford algebra.

Suppose there exist such that . Then there exists some and an epimorphism such that the image (and is not nilpotent) in .

However, consider the images of and in the central localization . Since , is “locally nilpotent” in . This property is preserved by homomorphism and localization. In a finite-dimensional simple Jordan algebra (which is either a field or Clifford type), the only elements satisfying the definition of are the zero elements (since the radical is 0). Therefore, and in .

It follows that in . Since is prime and embeds into (up to central torsion, but prime algebras are torsion-free over center), this implies in (or is nilpotent), which contradicts the assumption that .

Thus , and is an ideal. \end{proof}

Now we classify the elements in with . Define .

  • If is a prime algebra which satisfies and , then . ( is of finite dimension over .)
  • If , then is described in the following theorem.

Theorem

Let be a non-degenerate Jordan algebra which satisfies . Then is associative and thus a domain.

Therefore, if is simple and , then one of the followings hold.

  • , for some simple associative ;
  • is PI algebra;
    • if does not satisfy , then ;
    • if satisfies , then is associative.