Exercise. , . Characterize .

In fact, we obtain all possibilities of by magma.

Let be the set of minimal normal subgroups of . Then . Note that for any , can be seen as an irreducible -module. Otherwise, if is reducible, then there exists such that and so , .

If , then , which contradicts with . Thus .

If , then by NC lemma . Thus and . If , then is reducible, contradiction. Hence, is a characteristic subgroup of . Since , we have that and so has a normal subgroup of . Then where .

If , define . Then induces a set of isomorphisms of the module .
By Schur’s lemma, or . Then yields that . By magma, there does not exist an irreducible such that and . Therefore, .

If , then and is a normal subgroup of .

If , then with . Let be a Sylow -subgroup of . Then and so , where .


D:=SmallGroupDatabase();
A:=[s:s in SmallGroups(D, 72)|#Center(s) eq 1];
#A;
[GroupName(a):a in A];

for a in A do
    Order(MinimalNormalSubgroup(a));
    GroupName(MinimalNormalSubgroup(a));
    "------";
end for;

G:=GL(3,2);
L:=Subgroups(G);
L:=[l: l in L|#Center(l`subgroup) eq 1];
L:=[l: l in L|(72 div Order(l`subgroup))*Order(l`subgroup) eq 72];

for l in L do
    IsIrreducible(l`subgroup);
end for