Exercise. , . Characterize .
In fact, we obtain all possibilities of by magma.
Let be the set of minimal normal subgroups of . Then . Note that for any , can be seen as an irreducible -module. Otherwise, if is reducible, then there exists such that and so , .
If , then , which contradicts with . Thus .
If , then by NC lemma . Thus and . If , then is reducible, contradiction. Hence, is a characteristic subgroup of . Since , we have that and so has a normal subgroup of . Then where .
If , define . Then induces a set of isomorphisms of the module .
By Schur’s lemma, or . Then yields that . By magma, there does not exist an irreducible such that and . Therefore, .
If , then and is a normal subgroup of .
If , then with . Let be a Sylow -subgroup of . Then and so , where .
D:=SmallGroupDatabase();
A:=[s:s in SmallGroups(D, 72)|#Center(s) eq 1];
#A;
[GroupName(a):a in A];
for a in A do
Order(MinimalNormalSubgroup(a));
GroupName(MinimalNormalSubgroup(a));
"------";
end for;
G:=GL(3,2);
L:=Subgroups(G);
L:=[l: l in L|#Center(l`subgroup) eq 1];
L:=[l: l in L|(72 div Order(l`subgroup))*Order(l`subgroup) eq 72];
for l in L do
IsIrreducible(l`subgroup);
end for