lower central series

We say is a nilpotent group if it has a lower central series terminating in the trivial subgroup after finitely many steps. That is, a series of normal subgroups

where . The length of the lower central series is called the nilpotency class of .

central series

A group is called nilpotent if it has a chain of subgroups, which is called a central series,

such that and .

upper central series

A group has an upper central series terminating in the whole group after finitely many steps. That is, a series of normal subgroups

where and is the subgroup such that .

nilpotency class

For a nilpotent group, the smallest such that has a central series of length is called the nilpotency class of ; and is said to be nilpotent of class .

Equivalently, the nilpotency class of  equals the length of the lower central series or upper central series.

Observations.

  • A nilpotent group is a solvable group.
  • For any prime , a -group is a nilpotent group.
  • Direct product of two nilpotent groups is nilpotent.
  • and are not nilpotent.
  • Note that . (Maybe that’s why they are called upper/lower central series.)

Theorem

The followings are equivalent:

  • is nilpotent.
  • if , then .
  • each maximal subgroup of is normal and of prime index.
  • is a direct product of its Sylow subgroups.

\begin{proof} Assume (i) holds. Then has a central series

Let . Then there exists such that and . It yields that . So for any and , there is and so for some . We have

So , i.e. and . Thus , as in (ii).

Assume (ii) holds. Let be a maximal subgroup of . Then and so . The factor group is simple as is maximal. So is a prime, as in (iii).

Assume (iii) holds. Let . If is not normal in , then and . Let be a maximal subgroup of such that . Then . By Frattini’s argument, , a contradiction. Hence, and so is a direct product of Sylow subgroups.

Assume (iv) holds. Since -group is nilpotent and direct product of nilpotent groups is nilpotent, we obtain (i). \end{proof}

Remark. Note that for any Sylow -subgroup. So (ii)(iv) is easy.

Proposition

Let be nilpotent groups. Then is also a normal nilpotent group.

\begin{proof} \end{proof}