Definition of HS, HC and HA
The following property gives the structure of groups of type HS and HC. If , the type is named HS; while when the type is named HC.
Proposition
Let be a quasiprimitive permutation group acting on . If has two different minimal normal subgroups and , then there is
Furthermore, is isomorphic to a direct product of isomorphic nonabelian simple groups , and .
\begin{proof}
Since is quasiprimitive, groups and are transitive. By Minimal Normal Subgroups of Permutation Groups, we have , and . Note that can be identified by
where the notations come from Three Permutations on G Induced from G. By NC lemma, there is and so . Moreover, is proved here.
\end{proof}
Now we define the group of type HA.
If has an abelian minimal normal subgroup , then is the unique minimal normal subgroup of by ^9gl6q2. It deduces that . Furthermore, is elementary abelian. By the definition of quasiprimitive, is transitive on . Then by Frattini’s argument, there is with . Note that is regular on , so can be identified as a subgroup of . If is reducible, then has a normal subgroup , contradiction. Therefore, is defined as below.
Definition
Let for a prime and positive integer , and let be the semidirect product , a subgroup of the affine group on , where is the group of translations and is an irreducible subgroup of . Then is a quasiprimitive group of type HA.
These Groups are Primitive
Lemma
A quasiprimitive permutation group of type HS, HC or HA is primitive.
\begin{proof}
i) Let be of type HS with simple . By ^04lqgl, we have . Then where . It remains to show is a maximal subgroup by Equivalent Condition of Primitivity. Otherwise, there is a such that , and there exists an element with the form . Then .
For any element , we have and . Hence and so is a subgroup of , where
Since , the action of on by conjugation fixes . So and . Thus , contradiction. Therefore, is primitive.
ii) The proof is similar to i). Let be of type HC with a direct product of isomorphic simple groups. By ^04lqgl, we have . If with is not a maximal subgroup of , then there is a such that and has a subgroup where . Note that and is a minimal normal subgroup of . Thus and so , which is impossible. So is primitive.
iii) When is of type HA, the primitivity of is proved here.
\end{proof}