Basic Definitions and Properties of Dimension
Definition
Let be a variety. Define , where for some affine open set .
Remark.
- For nonempty open set , as and for any open set . Therefore, .
- If is affine, and . See here.
an equivalent definition
It has an equivalent geometric definition, via chains of irreducible closed subsets.
where each is an irreducible closed subset of . The equivalence is shown in ^jp5j6v.
Proposition
Since is algebraically closed, the following are equivalent:
- is a point.
\begin{proof}
i)←>ii) Since , we know . Conversely, if , then and so .
ii)→iii) Assume that . Since is a variety and a prevariety, it has an affine open subset . Then we have by remark and so is a point. Since is irreducible and is open in , we know .
iii)→ii) Since is a point, and . Then .
\end{proof}
Lemma
Let be an integral domain over a prime. Then , with equality only if or both sides are .
\begin{proof}
Let , and let . If the statement does not hold. Then there exist such that are algebraically independent. Let . Then are algebraically dependent, that is, there exists a polynomial such that . We can assume that . (If , then with . So we can replace by for some .)
Note that
and . As , they are algebraically dependent, which is a contradiction.
\end{proof}
Proposition
Let be a proper closed subvariety of . Then .
\begin{proof}
For , define for affine open set . Since , and . Note that and with a prime ideal , then yields and by ^xsfnsk.
\end{proof}
Krull's Principal ideal theorem (PIT)
Define
- a finitely generated integral domain over
- , and
- is a minimal prime ideal containing .
then .
Theorem
Let be an variety, and let be an open set. Take and is an irreducible component of . Then .
\begin{proof}
There exists open affine such that . Define with . Then is an irreducible component of . As by remark, it suffices to show .
Firstly, note that . On the other hand, recall that for a closed set which has irreducible components , then each corresponds a minimal prime ideals containing . So where is the minimal prime ideal containing , and we have and . Then by ^a5bed9 there is
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
Finite Morphism
Motivation for Finite Morphisms
Suppose we have a morphism of varieties . Naturally, we start asking:
- How are the dimensions of and related?
- Can the morphism “control” functions on via the structure of ?
- Is there a way to mimic finite field extensions through geometric maps?
These questions motivate the study of finite morphisms.
finite morphism
Let be a morphism between affine varieties, and let with and . Then is a finite morphism if is a finitely generated -module. Note that is a finitely generated -module iff is a finitely generated -module iff is integral dependent on , that is, for any , there exists a monic polynomial such that .
Remark. Recall that is a finitely generated -module is integral over is proved here.
Proposition
Let be a finite morphism.
- is a closed map, i.e., closed yields closed;
- for any , is a finite set (quasi-finite);
- is surjective iff is injective.
\begin{proof}
Define and , where . We claim that if , then . For any , one have and so . It deduces that . By maximal, there is .
i) For any closed such that , we aim to show with . Define , then is a finitely generated -module yields that is a finitely generated -module. Thus is integral over . By ^6qz19f, every prime ideal of is the restriction of a prime ideal from .
For any , take the corresponding maximal ideal . By Going-Up, there exists prime ideal of such that . It deduces that , for some maximal ideal . So and then by the argument above. Hence, for any , there exists such that . Therefore, .
Conversely, to show , it suffices to show for any , we have . Take and . For any , and so . Thus and so . Therefore, and is a closed map.
ii) Since is a finitely generated -module, we know is a finitely generated -module, where is a field. It deduces that is a finite-dimensional -algebra and so it is Artinian. By ^steden, has finitely many maximal ideals. Recall that for any , there is . Thus is a finite set.
iii) Assume that is surjective. If , then on and so . Thus and is injective. Conversely, if is injective, then by ^j3610u is dense in . Since is a closed map, and so is surjective.
\end{proof}
Counterexample. satisfies ii) but not i). It is not a finite morphism, because is not a finitely generated -module.
Remark. If is a closed subvariety, then is still finite, because is still finitely generated.
Codimension and Intersection Theory
Definition
Let be a variety, and let be a closed subset. We say has pure dimension if each of its irreducible component of is . Define . In general, .
Remark. By ^a5bed9, for any with , has pure .
Corollary
Let be a variety. For a maximal irreducible subset (i.e. if with irreducible , then ), we have .
\begin{proof}
Since , there is by ^7w5xag and so . If is an affine variety, then take any nonzero and consider . By ^a5bed9, each irreducible component has codimension . Since is irreducible, there exists such that . Additionally, since is maximal, one can check and so .
If is not affine, take an affine open set such that and define . We first prove that is a maximal irreducible subset of . For any irreducible closed subset such that , notice that and is an irreducible closed subset of . Claim that . Otherwise, and , which is impossible. Since is an open set of , it is dense, i.e., . As , there is , which deduces that . Therefore, and by the arbitrary of we know is maximal.
By homework, is an irreducible closed subset of and (otherwise and , which is impossible). Take such that and is not always zero over . Consider the set , which can be written as and . Since is irreducible and maximal in , we have for some and so . Since is an open subset of and is an open subset of , by remark we have .
\end{proof}
Topological characterization of dimension
Suppose
is any maximal chain of closed irreducible subsets of . Then .
\begin{proof}
Use induction and apply ^3de0e2.
\end{proof}
Corollary
Let be a variety and let be a component of , where . Then .
\begin{proof}
We prove it by induction on . When , is a component of . If , then and . Otherwise, if , then has codimension by ^a5bed9 and so for . Hence . Assume that the statement holds for , and assume is an irreducible component of . Then is contained in some irreducible component and so is an irreducible component of .
If , then and . Hence and we have done. If , then is an irreducible component of . By ^a5bed9, we have and so
By induction hypothesis, . Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
Example. Define , then and . However, cannot be generated by elements (not easy to prove).
Corollary
Let be an affine variety, and let be a closed irreducible subset. Let codim . Then there exist in such that is a component of .
\begin{proof}
We prove it by induction on . When , there is and so is what we desired. When , take and then . Since is irreducible, there exists an irreducible component such that . By ^a5bed9, and so , i.e., is a component of .
Assume that the statement holds for all , that is, if , then there exists such that is a component of . Now suppose . Since , there exists nonzero and . Then for some irreducible component . If , then and we have done. If , then . Note that is an affine variety as is an affine variety, then by induction hypothesis there exist such that is a component of . Suppose is a representative of .
Consider the set . We can prove that is an irreducible component of ; although the proof is nontrivial, we omit it here. This completes the argument.
\end{proof}
Proposition
Let be an affine variety with coordinate ring . Assume is a UFD. Then every closed subset of pure codimension 1 equals for some .
\begin{proof}
Since is a UFD, every minimal prime ideal of is principal. For a minimal prime ideal and , contains one of the prime factors of . By the UFD property, is also a prime ideal and since , we must have . Let be the components of . Then are minimal prime ideals. If , then
Now we finish the proof.
\end{proof}
Example. Localization can get better ring (non UFD → UFD for example).
- Define with , and .
- is a prime ideal, which is not a principal ideal.
- Consider its localization .
- is a UFD, because is a UFD and is a localization of and so also a UFD.
- is generated by , which is consistent with ^yof8h3.
Proposition
\begin{proof}
Suppose and are affine open sets. Then where , . Because , we have
It suffices to show : note that and are algebraic by ^d13b03, then are algebraic.
\end{proof}
Dimension in Projective Varieties
Theorem
Let be a projective variety, and let be its ideal. If is homogeneous and not a constant and , then is non-empty and of pure codimension in , unless .
Remark. does not always hold in affine case. For example, and do not have intersection.
\begin{proof}
It is enough to show for all non-constant , because remains part has proved by PIT.
Suppose . Define . Since is homogeneous, there is and so . Note that and is not always on as . By ^jp5j6v, every irreducible component of has dimension . It deduces that has a nonzero point , which corresponds to in . Then and so the set is nonempty.
\end{proof}
Corollary
Take homogeneous , where . If , then in .