Basic Definitions and Properties of Dimension

Definition

Let be a variety. Define , where for some affine open set .

Remark.

  • For nonempty open set , as and for any open set . Therefore, .
  • If is affine, and . See here.

an equivalent definition

It has an equivalent geometric definition, via chains of irreducible closed subsets.

where each is an irreducible closed subset of . The equivalence is shown in ^jp5j6v.

Proposition

Since is algebraically closed, the following are equivalent:

  • is a point.

\begin{proof} i)>ii) Since , we know . Conversely, if , then and so .

ii)iii) Assume that . Since is a variety and a prevariety, it has an affine open subset . Then we have by remark and so is a point. Since is irreducible and is open in , we know .

iii)ii) Since is a point, and . Then . \end{proof}

Lemma

Let be an integral domain over a prime. Then , with equality only if or both sides are .

\begin{proof} Let , and let . If the statement does not hold. Then there exist such that are algebraically independent. Let . Then are algebraically dependent, that is, there exists a polynomial such that . We can assume that . (If , then with . So we can replace by for some .)

Note that

and . As , they are algebraically dependent, which is a contradiction. \end{proof}

Proposition

Let be a proper closed subvariety of . Then .

\begin{proof} For , define for affine open set . Since , and . Note that and with a prime ideal , then yields and by ^xsfnsk. \end{proof}

Krull's Principal ideal theorem (PIT)

Define

  • a finitely generated integral domain over
  • , and
  • is a minimal prime ideal containing .

then .

Theorem

Let be an variety, and let be an open set. Take and is an irreducible component of . Then .

\begin{proof} There exists open affine such that . Define with . Then is an irreducible component of . As by remark, it suffices to show .

Firstly, note that . On the other hand, recall that for a closed set which has irreducible components , then each corresponds a minimal prime ideals containing . So where is the minimal prime ideal containing , and we have and . Then by ^a5bed9 there is

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Finite Morphism

Motivation for Finite Morphisms

Suppose we have a morphism of varieties . Naturally, we start asking:

  • How are the dimensions of and related?
  • Can the morphism “control” functions on via the structure of ?
  • Is there a way to mimic finite field extensions through geometric maps?

These questions motivate the study of finite morphisms.

finite morphism

Let be a morphism between affine varieties, and let with and . Then is a finite morphism if is a finitely generated -module. Note that is a finitely generated -module iff is a finitely generated -module iff is integral dependent on , that is, for any , there exists a monic polynomial such that .

Remark. Recall that is a finitely generated -module is integral over is proved here.

Proposition

Let be a finite morphism.

  • is a closed map, i.e., closed yields closed;
  • for any , is a finite set (quasi-finite);
  • is surjective iff is injective.

\begin{proof} Define and , where . We claim that if , then . For any , one have and so . It deduces that . By maximal, there is .

i) For any closed such that , we aim to show with . Define , then is a finitely generated -module yields that is a finitely generated -module. Thus is integral over . By ^6qz19f, every prime ideal of is the restriction of a prime ideal from .

For any , take the corresponding maximal ideal . By Going-Up, there exists prime ideal of such that . It deduces that , for some maximal ideal . So and then by the argument above. Hence, for any , there exists such that . Therefore, .

Conversely, to show , it suffices to show for any , we have . Take and . For any , and so . Thus and so . Therefore, and is a closed map.

ii) Since is a finitely generated -module, we know is a finitely generated -module, where is a field. It deduces that is a finite-dimensional -algebra and so it is Artinian. By ^steden, has finitely many maximal ideals. Recall that for any , there is . Thus is a finite set.

iii) Assume that is surjective. If , then on and so . Thus and is injective. Conversely, if is injective, then by ^j3610u is dense in . Since is a closed map, and so is surjective. \end{proof}

Counterexample. satisfies ii) but not i). It is not a finite morphism, because is not a finitely generated -module.

Remark. If is a closed subvariety, then is still finite, because is still finitely generated.

Codimension and Intersection Theory

Definition

Let be a variety, and let be a closed subset. We say has pure dimension if each of its irreducible component of is . Define . In general, .

Remark. By ^a5bed9, for any with , has pure .

Corollary

Let be a variety. For a maximal irreducible subset (i.e. if with irreducible , then ), we have .

\begin{proof} Since , there is by ^7w5xag and so . If is an affine variety, then take any nonzero and consider . By ^a5bed9, each irreducible component has codimension . Since is irreducible, there exists such that . Additionally, since is maximal, one can check and so .

If is not affine, take an affine open set such that and define . We first prove that is a maximal irreducible subset of . For any irreducible closed subset such that , notice that and is an irreducible closed subset of . Claim that . Otherwise, and , which is impossible. Since is an open set of , it is dense, i.e., . As , there is , which deduces that . Therefore, and by the arbitrary of we know is maximal.

By homework, is an irreducible closed subset of and (otherwise and , which is impossible). Take such that and is not always zero over . Consider the set , which can be written as and . Since is irreducible and maximal in , we have for some and so . Since is an open subset of and is an open subset of , by remark we have . \end{proof}

Topological characterization of dimension

Suppose

is any maximal chain of closed irreducible subsets of . Then .

\begin{proof} Use induction and apply ^3de0e2. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be a variety and let be a component of , where . Then .

\begin{proof} We prove it by induction on . When , is a component of . If , then and . Otherwise, if , then has codimension by ^a5bed9 and so for . Hence . Assume that the statement holds for , and assume is an irreducible component of . Then is contained in some irreducible component and so is an irreducible component of .

If , then and . Hence and we have done. If , then is an irreducible component of . By ^a5bed9, we have and so

By induction hypothesis, . Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Example. Define , then and . However, cannot be generated by elements (not easy to prove).

Corollary

Let be an affine variety, and let be a closed irreducible subset. Let codim . Then there exist in such that is a component of .

\begin{proof} We prove it by induction on . When , there is and so is what we desired. When , take and then . Since is irreducible, there exists an irreducible component such that . By ^a5bed9, and so , i.e., is a component of .

Assume that the statement holds for all , that is, if , then there exists such that is a component of . Now suppose . Since , there exists nonzero and . Then for some irreducible component . If , then and we have done. If , then . Note that is an affine variety as is an affine variety, then by induction hypothesis there exist such that is a component of . Suppose is a representative of .

Consider the set . We can prove that is an irreducible component of ; although the proof is nontrivial, we omit it here. This completes the argument. \end{proof}

Proposition

Let be an affine variety with coordinate ring . Assume is a UFD. Then every closed subset of pure codimension 1 equals for some .

\begin{proof} Since is a UFD, every minimal prime ideal of is principal. For a minimal prime ideal and , contains one of the prime factors of . By the UFD property, is also a prime ideal and since , we must have . Let be the components of . Then are minimal prime ideals. If , then

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Example. Localization can get better ring (non UFD UFD for example).

  • Define with , and .
    • is a prime ideal, which is not a principal ideal.
  • Consider its localization .
    • is a UFD, because is a UFD and is a localization of and so also a UFD.
    • is generated by , which is consistent with ^yof8h3.

Proposition

\begin{proof} Suppose and are affine open sets. Then where , . Because , we have

It suffices to show : note that and are algebraic by ^d13b03, then are algebraic. \end{proof}

Dimension in Projective Varieties

Theorem

Let be a projective variety, and let be its ideal. If is homogeneous and not a constant and , then is non-empty and of pure codimension in , unless .

Remark. does not always hold in affine case. For example, and do not have intersection.

\begin{proof} It is enough to show for all non-constant , because remains part has proved by PIT.

Suppose . Define . Since is homogeneous, there is and so . Note that and is not always on as . By ^jp5j6v, every irreducible component of has dimension . It deduces that has a nonzero point , which corresponds to in . Then and so the set is nonempty. \end{proof}

Corollary

Take homogeneous , where . If , then in .