Basic Concepts of Prevarieties
Definition
Let be a topological space, and let be the sheaf of -valued function on . Then is a prevariety if
- is connected;
- there exists finite open covering such that is an irreducible affine variety.
Definition
is irreducible iff one of the followings hold:
- if with closed, then there exists ;
- for any open sets , there is ;
- any open set is dense.
\begin{proof}
i)→ii) Assume that there exists open sets such that , then we have and are closed, which is impossible.
ii)→iii) If there exists open such that , then is an open set and , leading to a contradiction.
iii)→i) If there exist closed set and such that and WLOG suppose , then and so . Since is open, there is . It deduces that .
\end{proof}
Note that irreducible set is connected.
Proposition
Prevariety is irreducible.
\begin{proof}
Define . For nonempty open , define and . Then . If there exists , then there is such that is irreducible and . Similarly, we can find affine such that . Thus . Since is an open set of and is irreducible, we have . Then , contradiction. Therefore, . By connectedness of , and . Hence, for any open set , and so is irreducible.
\end{proof}
Proposition
Let be a prevariety. The closed subsets are DCC.
\begin{proof}
For a chain of closed set , since with irreducible, there is DCC and so for .
\end{proof}
Proposition
Let be a Noetherian topological space, i.e., closed sets satisfy DCC. For any closed set , there exists unique decomposition such that is irreducible, and are called irreducible component.
\begin{proof}
Existence: assume is the minimal element such that the above property does not hold. Then is not irreducible, and where closed . It deduces that and can be decomposed as union of finitely many irreducible closed sets. So the above property also holds for , contradiction.
Uniqueness: let be distinct decompositions, then . Since is irreducible, there exists such that and so . Conversely for some and . Therefore, the decomposition is unique.
\end{proof}
Structure and Functions on Prevarieties
functional field
Let be a prevariety. The functional field is the generic stalk of , i.e. .
The elements of are called rational functions on , although they are only functions on open dense subsets of .
Fact. For affine set , define and it is an integral domain and there is . We claim that . For any , for some with . Then for an open dense and so . Let . Then for some non-empty open set and . Consider the intersection , which is open because and are open. Let , then there exist such that for all and for all . Notice that the fraction is an element of and is equivalent to . Therefore, in . Now we finish the proof.
Local Ring of along
Let be an irreducible closed subset of , and let
Note that and (see here), so is intermediate between the that leads to and that which leads to .
For a given affine set with , define . Then is closed in and for some prime ideal . As is irreducible, is also irreducible and . Note that
Since and , there exists such that and as is a set of topological basis. Then
by ^9d743b.
Geometric Meaning
Just as the stalk consists of germs of functions defined in neighborhoods of a point consists of germs of functions defined in open sets that approach or meet the entire subvariety . Two functions and represent the same element in if they agree on some smaller open set which still intersects .
an Example
Example. For with , there is .
- The corresponding coordinate rings are
- and
- and
- Construct projective line .
- Define and
- For any open subset , define .
- Then is a prevariety, as with and .
- On the other hand, construct the non-separated prevariety . ^v1yo0z
- Define the isomorphism by and maps and .
- For any open subset , define , where is the stalk at .
- Then is a prevariety, as is a finite union of affine open sets such that the structure sheaf restricts correctly: and .
- This space is not a variety because it fails the separation axiom, i.e., it is not “Hausdorff”. It is often called the “affine line with the origin doubled”. See here.
Substructures of Prevarieties
Proposition
Let be a prevariety. For any open set , is also a prevariety.
\begin{proof}
Note that is connected. Otherwise with open . Then is irreducible yields that , contradiction.
Assume that is a finite open cover of . For any , there exists such that . Then we can find such that . Notice that is affine, and then is affine. Hence, has an open cover with affine.
Then , as we cannot have strictly increasing sequence of open sets in by ^uia9mm.
\end{proof}
Proposition
Now let be a closed irreducible subset of a prevariety . The sheaf induces a sheaf on as follows: If is open in , define
Then the pair is a prevariety.
\begin{proof}
- connected
- with affine. There is where
\end{proof}
Combining ^695715 and ^ee0fb8 we can even give a prevariety structure to every locally closed subset of a prevariety : For any irreducible, open, then (locally closed subset) admits a prevariety structure.
Introduction to Projective Varieties
Let be a homogeneous prime ideal. Define and . We aim to make into a prevariety.
Define graded integral domain with
Define . Note that for and , does not depend on the choice of representative of . Hence we can define for for some and then define a ring
The set is the unique maximal ideal, as any element not in is invertible in . Hence, is a local ring.
We now define a sheaf on by
Remark that . We claim that is an affine variety. Here we only check the case of .
For every homogeneous polynomial , is a polynomial in the variables . Let be the ideal generated by all these . We can map into a subring of by taking to the function given by ; the kernel of this map is exactly , so is prime. Note that we get an isomorphism
and is actually a homeomorphism.
Now for , the local ring is the set of all elements of having the form for in some . Define .
If , then is the set of all elements in having the form for . Then
extends to an isomorphism . Moreover, takes precisely onto .
- First of all it clearly maps into ; and
- if , then in and come from in with .
- Thus the local rings correspond;
- since the sheaves were defined by intersecting local rings, they also correspond, and is indeed an affine variety.
Morphism between Varieties
Definition
Let and be prevarieties. A map is a morphism if is continuous and, for all open sets in ,
Remark. The definition is compatible with ^4524hh, see here.
Proposition
Let be any map. Let be a collection of open affine subsets covering . Suppose that is an open covering of such that
- maps into .
Then is a morphism.
\begin{proof}
See Mumford, page 42.
\end{proof}