When are affine varieties, we have defined morphisms :

Let and be irreducible algebraic sets. A map is called a morphism if there exists such that for any .

Link to original

We also define morphism between prevarieties:

g \in \Gamma\left(V, \underline{o}_Y\right) \Longrightarrow g \cdot f \in \Gamma\left(f^{-1} V, \underline{o}_X\right) .
Link to original

For with affine varieties, show that the two definitions are compatible.

\begin{proof} i)ii). Assume that and . If satisfies for any with , then is continuous. It suffices to show for any open , there exists .

For any , can be written as , where , and . (Here we take as distinguished open sets.) Then as , and . Therefore, is a morphism in the second definition.

ii)i). Assume that is continuous and for all open sets in ,

Take , which is an open set of . For , we have and . Therefore, is a morphism in the first definition. \end{proof}

Let be a prevariety, and let be open sets with . Prove that is injective.

\begin{proof} Note that and , then and inclusion map is injective. \end{proof}

Let be a prevariety, and let be an irreducible closed subset. For an open set , is still irreducible.

\begin{proof} Since is an irreducible closed subset, is also a prevariety by Proposition 1.5.5 and then is irreducible. Since is an open set of , is also a prevariety by Proposition 1.5.4 and then is irreducible. \end{proof}

Problem on page 32. Generalize the result by which we covered by open affine sets as follows: for all homogeneous polynomials of positive degree, show that is an affine variety.

\begin{proof} Assume that . Let be the set of all monomials of degree in , where . Define

then is a morphism by definition. For each nonzero , WLOG assume and , then and so is an isomorphism.

Since , with . It deduces that is an affine variety and so for . \end{proof}

Check that is isomorphic to , where are irreducible closed set.

\begin{proof} Assume that and , then it suffices to show

It is easy to check and we finish the proof. \end{proof}