Corollary

Let be a DVR with maximal ideal and . Let be a finite group. Let be finitely generated projective -modules. Then as -modules iff as -modules.

\begin{proof} See ^k0k1kv. \end{proof}

Definition

An -module is called an -lattice if it is finitely generated and free as -module.

Proposition

Let be a complete DVR with maximal idea and . Let be a finite group.

  • For each simple -module , there is a unique indecomposable projective -module that is a projective cover of . It has the form where is a primitive idempotent in with .

  • The -module is the projective cover of as -modules and is the projective cover of as -modules. Furthermore. is the unique simple quotient of .

    Thus for simple -modules and , .

  • Every finitely generated -module has a projective cover.

  • Every finitely generated indecomposable projective -module is isomorphic to for some simple .

  • Every finitely generated projective -module can be lifted to be an -lattice such a lift is unique up to isomorphism and projective.

    An -lattice is a projective -module iff is a projective -module.

    Projective -module and are isomorphic iff .

\begin{proof} See ^5awwqe. \end{proof}

Definition

Let be a PID, and let . Given as a subset of . In this situation, the -module can be written in .

Conversely, if is an -module, a full -lattice in is an -lattice that has an -basis is also an -basis of . In this situation, .

Lemma

Let be a PID, and let . Let be a finitely generated -vector space. Any finitely generated -module that contains an -basis of is a full -lattice in .

\begin{proof} See ^vnn9oj. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be a PID, and let be a field of fractions. Let be a finitely generated -module. Then there exists an full -lattices of .

\begin{proof} See ^qsdviu. \end{proof}

Brauer-Nesbitt

Let be a -modular system with , a finite group, and a finite-dimensional -module. Let and be full -lattices in , then , have the same composition factors with the same multiplications as -modules.

\begin{proof} See ^7sv8b9. \end{proof}

decomposition matrix

Let be a splitting -modular system for . The decomposition matrix of is the matrix with

  • rows indexed by the simple -modules,

  • columns indexed by the simple -modules,

  • entries are the number

    where is a simple -module, is a simple -module, and is a full -lattices in .

Definition

Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra, where is any field.

Define as the free abelian group with the isomorphism types of simple -modules as a basis, which is called Grothendieck group.

Define as the free abelian group with isomorphism types of indecomposable projective -modules as a basis.

If is a simple -module, then write for the corresponding basis element of . If is a indecomposable projective -module, then write for the corresponding basis element of .

If is an -module with composition factors with multiplications , we write

If is a projective -module with where are indecomposable projective -module. Put

Let with be a splitting -modular system for a finite group . Suppose the valuation of is complete. Notice that

  • the number of -regular conjugacy class

  • dce triangle:

  • If is a index projective -module, then , where is an -module that lifts .

  • Now is a projective cover of . Define . Remark that for each simple -module , where is the entries of Cartan matrix.

  • If is a simple -module containing a full -lattice . Put . The matrix of is the transpose of decomposition matrix.

Proposition

, i.e., the diagram commutes.

\begin{proof} See ^j43lpr. \end{proof}

Proposition

Let be a -modular system. Let be -modules, containing full -lattices , respectively.

  • is a full -lattices of

  • Suppose further that is projective. Then

\begin{proof} See ^hfu3dq. \end{proof}

Corollary

Suppose are full -lattices of -modules , and is projective. Then .

Theorem

Let be a splitting -modular system for , where is complete.

  • Let be a simple -module and a simple -module containing a full -lattice . The multiplicity of in equals the multiplicity of as a composition factor in .
  • The matrix of is , where is the decomposition matrix.

\begin{proof} See ^5kl5ya. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be the splitting -modular system for , where is complete. Then the Cartan matrix , where is the decomposition matrix. In particular, is a symmetric matrix.