Annihilator

Definition

Let be a ring, and let be a left -module. For any , define

as the annihilator of in . Notice that is a left ideal of .

For a set , define . If is a -submodule of , then is a -sided ideal of .

Lemma

Let be a ring with identity . Let be a left simple -module. Then is a quotient of the left regular module .

\begin{proof} See ^09efb3. \end{proof}

Theorem

A finite-dimensional semisimple -algebra over a field with is isomorphism to a direct sum of matrix algebras over .

\begin{proof} See ^88dlwq. \end{proof}

Corollary

If is a finite-dimensional -algebra, then any simple -module is of finite-dimensional as -vector space.

Proposition

Let be a finite-dimensional semisimple -algebra over a field . In any decomposition where the are pairwise non-isomorphic simple -modules, we have is a complete set of representative of the isomorphism of simple -modules.

If moreover , then and .

\begin{proof} See ^yo1zc8. \end{proof}

Idempotents

Idempotents(幂等元)

Let be a ring with identity. An idempotent in is a non-zero element with .

Fact.

  • is a ring with identity , where .
  • For any , for some and then .

Definition

Two idenmpotents are called orthogonal if . More generally, idempotents are called orthogonal if .

Fact. If are orthogonal idempotent, then is also an idempotent.

Definition

  • An idempotent is called primitive if it is not a sum of two orthogonal idempotents.
  • An idempotnet decomposition of an idenpotent , we mean into a sum of orthogonal idenpotents. If moreover are primitive, the it is called a primitive idenpotnet decomposition.

For example, for with , is a idempotent decomposition.

Theorem

Let be an idempotent of . If is an idempotent decomposition, then as left ideals or left -modules.

Conversely, if is a direct sum of left ideals of , , then there is an idempotent decomposition with and .

In this way, the idempotent decomposition of are in bijection with the direct sum decomposition of the left ideals .

\begin{proof} See ^1dezlm. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be an idem of . TFAE:

  • is primitive;
  • is indecomposable as a left -module;
  • is the unique idempotent in .

\begin{proof} See ^tv7l9r. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be idempotents of , and let be an -module.

  • . In particular, as abelian groups.
  • as rings.

\begin{proof} See ^yr2ffd. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be idempotent of . TFAE:

  • as left -modules.
  • as right -modules.
  • There exist and with , .

\begin{proof} See ^spaio1. \end{proof}

Jacobson Radical

Definition

Let be a ring. The Jacobson radical of is the intersection of all left maximal ideals of . As a left -module, .

Theorem

The following holds for the radical of a ring .

  • is the intersection of all the annihilator ideals of simple (left) -modules. Consequently, is a -sided ideal of .
  • iff has a left inverse for all , i.e., there exists such that .
  • is the largest one among the ideals of satisfying the following condition: if , then is a unit of .
  • coincides with the intersection of all maximal right ideals of .

\begin{proof} See ^p95eh4 \end{proof}

Definition

  • An element is called nilpotent if for some . If so, and is a unit.
  • An left ideal of is called a nil left ideal if every element of is nilpotent.
  • is called nilpotent if for some . Clearly, nilpotent ideals are nil.

Theorem

If is a nil left ideal, then .

\begin{proof} See ^112eab. \end{proof}

Theorem

If is Artinian, then is nilpotent.

\begin{proof} See ^a43f1d. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be an Artinian ring, then is the maximal nilpotent left ideal of .

\begin{proof} See ^8uxtcw. \end{proof}

Corollary

Let be an Artinian ring. Then is the unique left ideal of with the property that is nilpotnent and is semisimple.

\begin{proof} See ^ds8ywb. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be a -sided ideal of with . Then .

\begin{proof} See ^dh47bb. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be an Artinian. Then is semisimple iff .

\begin{proof} See ^t0akw2. \end{proof}