Annihilator
Definition
Let be a ring, and let be a left -module. For any , define
as the annihilator of in . Notice that is a left ideal of .
For a set , define . If is a -submodule of , then is a -sided ideal of .
Lemma
Let be a ring with identity . Let be a left simple -module. Then is a quotient of the left regular module .
\begin{proof}
See ^09efb3.
\end{proof}
Theorem
A finite-dimensional semisimple -algebra over a field with is isomorphism to a direct sum of matrix algebras over .
\begin{proof}
See ^88dlwq.
\end{proof}
Corollary
If is a finite-dimensional -algebra, then any simple -module is of finite-dimensional as -vector space.
Proposition
Let be a finite-dimensional semisimple -algebra over a field . In any decomposition where the are pairwise non-isomorphic simple -modules, we have is a complete set of representative of the isomorphism of simple -modules.
If moreover , then and .
\begin{proof}
See ^yo1zc8.
\end{proof}
Idempotents
Idempotents(幂等元)
Let be a ring with identity. An idempotent in is a non-zero element with .
Fact.
- is a ring with identity , where .
- For any , for some and then .
Definition
Two idenmpotents are called orthogonal if . More generally, idempotents are called orthogonal if .
Fact. If are orthogonal idempotent, then is also an idempotent.
Definition
- An idempotent is called primitive if it is not a sum of two orthogonal idempotents.
- An idempotnet decomposition of an idenpotent , we mean into a sum of orthogonal idenpotents. If moreover are primitive, the it is called a primitive idenpotnet decomposition.
For example, for with , is a idempotent decomposition.
Theorem
Let be an idempotent of . If is an idempotent decomposition, then as left ideals or left -modules.
Conversely, if is a direct sum of left ideals of , , then there is an idempotent decomposition with and .
In this way, the idempotent decomposition of are in bijection with the direct sum decomposition of the left ideals .
\begin{proof}
See ^1dezlm.
\end{proof}
Corollary
Let be an idem of . TFAE:
- is primitive;
- is indecomposable as a left -module;
- is the unique idempotent in .
\begin{proof}
See ^tv7l9r.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be idempotents of , and let be an -module.
- . In particular, as abelian groups.
- as rings.
\begin{proof}
See ^yr2ffd.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be idempotent of . TFAE:
- as left -modules.
- as right -modules.
- There exist and with , .
\begin{proof}
See ^spaio1.
\end{proof}
Jacobson Radical
Definition
Let be a ring. The Jacobson radical of is the intersection of all left maximal ideals of . As a left -module, .
Theorem
The following holds for the radical of a ring .
- is the intersection of all the annihilator ideals of simple (left) -modules. Consequently, is a -sided ideal of .
- iff has a left inverse for all , i.e., there exists such that .
- is the largest one among the ideals of satisfying the following condition: if , then is a unit of .
- coincides with the intersection of all maximal right ideals of .
\begin{proof}
See ^p95eh4
\end{proof}
Definition
- An element is called nilpotent if for some . If so, and is a unit.
- An left ideal of is called a nil left ideal if every element of is nilpotent.
- is called nilpotent if for some . Clearly, nilpotent ideals are nil.
Theorem
If is a nil left ideal, then .
\begin{proof}
See ^112eab.
\end{proof}
Theorem
If is Artinian, then is nilpotent.
\begin{proof}
See ^a43f1d.
\end{proof}
Corollary
Let be an Artinian ring, then is the maximal nilpotent left ideal of .
\begin{proof}
See ^8uxtcw.
\end{proof}
Corollary
Let be an Artinian ring. Then is the unique left ideal of with the property that is nilpotnent and is semisimple.
\begin{proof}
See ^ds8ywb.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be a -sided ideal of with . Then .
\begin{proof}
See ^dh47bb.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be an Artinian. Then is semisimple iff .
\begin{proof}
See ^t0akw2.
\end{proof}