In this section, we study the relationship between torsion-free finitely generated -modules and their embeddings into .

This leads to the concept of fractional modules.

Torsion Elements and Torsion Free Elements

Definition

Let be a ring, and let be a -module. is said to be

  • a torsion element if
  • a torsion free element if .

Example.

  • -module has no torsion element but .
  • is commutative,
    • has no torsion element but iff is an integral domain;
    • if is a proper ideal, all elements of -module are torsion;
    • has no torsion element but , iff is prime.

Lemma

If is an integral domain, the subset of

is a submodule of , which is called the torsion submodule of .

Definition

We say is a torsion module if , and is torsion free if .

Examples.

  • -modules: , and
  • For an integral domain and a -module , there is , where .

Proposition

Let be an integral domain, then its free modules are torsion free.

Proposition

Let be an integral domain. Any finitely generated torsion free -module is isomorphic to a submodule of a free -module of finite rank.

\begin{proof} Suppose is generated by non-zero elements . Up to reordering, assume is a maximal linearly independent subset of . If , then is free. Now assume that . Consider . For each , there exists nonzero such that . Let . Then . Consider , which is injective. Therefore, is isomorphic to a free -module of finite rank. \end{proof}

Torsion-Free Modules and Fractional Ideals

Let be an integral domain, and let be the fraction field of . The following proposition shows that any torsion-free -module  can be embedded into a vector space over . This new setting, in which division is always possible, motivates the generalization of an ideal to a fractional ideal.

Proposition

Define , then with . The kernel of is .

\begin{proof} If , then . For any , there exists nonzero such that and then . Therefore, . \end{proof}

Corollary

  • TFAE:
    • the natural -morphism is injective
    • is torsion free.

Corollary

If is finitely generated projective -module, then is injective.

\begin{proof} Since is a finitely generated projective -module by ^ajkzkw, is a direct summand of for some . Then is torsion free by ^m4tylw and so is injective. \end{proof}

Definition

The rank of a finitely generated torsion free -module is the dimension of the -space .

Remark. A finitely generated torsion free -module of rank is isomorphic to a finitely generated -submodule of .

  • Indeed, if is a -dimensional vector space over , then . Define , then is a -submodule of , and we have .
  • In other words, a finitely generated torsion-free -module of rank can be viewed as a fractional ideal of , that is, as a finitely generated -submodule of its field of fractions .

Let be a finitely generated torsion free -module. By ^952afe, injective. So can be viewed as an -submodule of . Given an -basis of , assume is generated by as -module. Then each can be written as

where and . There exists such that . Additionally, generated . This motivates the following definition:

Definition

Let be an -vector space of dimension . A fractional -module in is an -submodule such that

  • generates ;
  • given any basis of , there exists with such that .

In the case , fractional modules are called fractional ideals of . It is an -submodule of such that there exists nonzero such that . Hence is an ideal of . Note that

  • every finitely generated -submodule of is a fractional ideal (if it is not finitely generated, there may not exist such that ).
  • if is Noetherian, then these submodules of are all fractional ideals. That is, when is Noetherian, finitely generated -module fractional ideal.

the proof of the second statement

Let be a Noetherian integral domain and . Let be an -submodule of . We want to show that is a fractional ideal if and only if is finitely generated.

() Assume is finitely generated. Let for some . Since , we can write where and . Let . Then and . For each , . Then . By definition, is a fractional ideal.

() Assume is a fractional ideal. By definition, is an -submodule of and there exists such that . Let . Note that is an -submodule of , which means is an ideal of . Since is a Noetherian ring, the ideal must be finitely generated. Let for some . Since , we can write for some . We claim .

Take any . Then . So, for some . Substituting , we get . Since and is a field, we can multiply by to get . This shows . The inclusion is clear since each and is an -module. Thus, , which means is finitely generated.