Let be a primitive idempotent decomposition in . Let be a primitive idempotent decomposition in with .

Definition

We denote by the multiplicity of in , which is called the Cartan variant in . The matrix is called the Cartan matrix of .

Theorem

iff .

\begin{proof} See ^e4tl53. \end{proof}

For convenience, if and are two simple -modules, we denote by , the corresponding Cartan invariant, i.e., the multiplicity of in .

Proposition

Let be a finitely generated -algebra over a field , and a simple -module with projective over . Let be a finitely dimensional -module.

  • If is a simple -module, then

  • The multiplicity of in is .

  • If is an idempotent, then .

  • Let and be idempotents so that and are projective covers of and . Then

    If moreover , then .

\begin{proof} See ^qi7oer. \end{proof}

Let be a commutative ring with . For -modules and , we have an -morphism

Proposition

The image of this morphism is comprised of those morphism from to which factor through some finite power of .

\begin{proof} See ^v26ddz. \end{proof}

projective morphisms

Recall that the dual of an -module is defined as . Taking , we obtain a natural -linear map

The image of is denoted by , and its elements are called projective morphisms from to .

Lemma

For any -module , is a -sided ideal of the ring .

\begin{proof} See ^smhffy. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be an -module. TFAE:

  • is a finitely generated projective module.
  • .
  • For any -module , the morphism is an isomorphism.
  • For any -module , the morphism is an isomorphism.
  • The morphism is an isomorphism.

\begin{proof} See ^joizl5. \end{proof}

Integrality

Let be an commutative integral domain with .

Definition

Let be a subring of containing . We say is an integral element over , if there exists a monic polynomial such that .

Proposition

Let be rings and . TFAE:

  • is an integral domain over
  • is a finitely generated -module.
  • There exists a subring of with such that is a finitely generated -module and .

\begin{proof} See ^274bb5. \end{proof}

Lemma

are as above. where are subrings of . If are finitely generated -modules, then the ring is finitely generated as an -module.

\begin{proof} See ^0f6d0e. \end{proof}

Theorem

are as above. The integral elements of over form a subring of containing .

\begin{proof} See ^b8xi28. \end{proof}

Definition

  • are as above. The subring of containing of integral of over is called the integral closure of in .
  • is called integral closed in if every integral elements of over is containing in .
  • We say an integral domain is integral closed if it is integral closed in tis fractional field.
  • , if is integral over , we call an algebraic integer. All algebraic integer form a ring.

Theorem

A UFD is integral closed.

\begin{proof} See ^437xgo. \end{proof}

Torsion and torsion free elements

Definition

Let be a ring, and let be a -module. is said to be

  • a torsion element if
  • a torsion free element if .

Example.

  • -module has no torsion element but .
  • is commutative,
    • has no torsion element but iff is an integral domain;
    • if is a proper ideal, all element if -module are torsion;
    • has no torsion element but , iff is prime.

Lemma

If is an integral domain, the subset of

is a submodule of , which is called the torsion submodule of .

Definition

We say is a torsion module if , and is torsion free if .

Examples.

  • -modules: , and
  • For an integral domain and a -module , where .

Proposition

Let be an integral domain. Free modules are torsion free.

Proposition

Let be an integral domain. Any finitely generated torsion free -module is isomorphic to a submodule of a free -module of finite rank.

\begin{proof} See ^czedmd. \end{proof}

Localization

f:S^{-1}A\otimes_A M\simeq S^{-1}M,a/s\otimes m\mapsto am/s.
Link to original

Set with . The kernel of is .

Corollary

  • TFAE:
    • the natural -morphism is injective
    • is torsion free.

Corollary

If is finitely generated projective -module, then is injective.

\begin{proof} See ^952afe. \end{proof}

Definition

The rank of a finitely generated torsion free -module is the dimension of the -space .

Remark. A finitely generated torsion free -module of rank is isomorphic to a finitely generated -submodule of .

  • Indeed, if is a -dimensional vector space over , then . Define , then is a -submodule of , and we have .
  • In other words, a finitely generated torsion-free -module of rank can be viewed as a fractional ideal of , that is, as a finitely generated -submodule of its field of fractions .

Let be a finitely generated torsion free -module. By ^952afe, injective. So can be viewed as an -submodule of . Given an -basis of , assume is generated by as -module. Then each can be written as

where and . There exists such that . Additionally, generated . This motivates the following definition:

Definition

Let be an -vector space of finitely generated . A fractional -module in is an -submodule of such that

  • generates ;
  • given any basis of , there exists with such that .

In the case , fractional modules are called fractional ideals of . It is an -submodule of such that there exists nonzero such that . Hence is an ideal of .

  • every finitely generated -submodule of is a fractional ideal
  • if is Noetherian, then these are all fractional ideals. That is, when is Noetherian, finitely generated -module fractional ideal.

the proof of the second statement

Let be a Noetherian integral domain and . Let be an -submodule of . We want to show that is a fractional ideal if and only if is finitely generated.

() Assume is finitely generated. Let for some . Since , we can write where and . Let . Then and . For each , . Then . By definition, is a fractional ideal.

() Assume is a fractional ideal. By definition, is an -submodule of and there exists such that . Let . Note that is an -submodule of , which means is an ideal of . Since is a Noetherian ring, the ideal must be finitely generated. Let for some . Since , we can write for some . We claim .

Take any . Then . So, for some . Substituting , we get . Since and is a field, we can multiply by to get . This shows . The inclusion is clear since each and is an -module. Thus, , which means is finitely generated.