product measure

Let and be measurable spaces, and, let be the Cartesian product of the sets and . A subset of is a measurable rectangle if it has the form for some and some ; the -algebra on generated by the collection of all measurable rectangles is called the product of the -algebras and and is denoted by .

Lemma

Let and be measurable spaces.

  • If is a subset of that belongs to , then each section belongs to and each section belongs to .
  • If is an extended real-valued (or a complex-valued) -measurable function on , then each section is -measurable and each section is -measurable.

\begin{proof} See here. It is similar as the proof in 3 the Monotone Class Theorem. \end{proof}

Lemma

Let and be -finite measure spaces. If , then the function is -measurable and the function is -measurable.

\begin{proof} See here. It is also similar as the proof in 3 the Monotone Class Theorem. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let and be -finite measure spaces. Then there is a unique measure on the -algebra such that holds for each and . Furthermore, for any , we have

The measure is called the product of and .

\begin{proof} We define and . Then it suffices to show:

  • are measures;
  • these two measures coincide on all measurable rectangles;
  • the set of measurable rectangles form a -system;
  • use ^ljjfjj.

Also see here. \end{proof}

Tonelli's Theorem

Let and be -finite measure spaces, and let be -measurable. Then

  • the function is -measurable and the function is -measurable, and
  • satisfies

Note that the functions and are nonnegative and measurable; thus the expression is defined for each in and the expression is defined for each .

\begin{proof} It suffices to show these statements hold for character functions by ^db74fa and ^b32528 and so for simple function. Then use simple function to approximate measurable function and by MCT we finish the proof.

Also see here. \end{proof}

Fubini's Theorem

Let and be -finite measure spaces, and let be -measurable and . Then

Furthermore, is an -measurable function on and is a -measurable function on , and

\begin{proof} By , we have , , , are finite almost everywhere. Then use ^67db20.

Also see here. \end{proof}

Remark. being -finite is necessary. As a counterexample, consider Lebesgue measure , counting measure and with .

Remark of the remark above. 这一节几乎所有结果都需要 -finite,主要是因为我们需要 可测来定义 上的积分, which is defined as .

  • ^db74fa
    • we prove the finite measure case and then the -finite case;
    • it ensures that and are measurable sets, which is important for ^b32528.
  • ^b32528 is a proof of Tonelli’s theorem for character functions. Only with this conclusion, Tonelli’s theorem holds for simple functions and so measurable functions.

Example

Assume that is an -measurable function. We have the often useful relation

\begin{proof} Define , which is the region under the graph of . Since is measurable, there exists and is measurable. Then we can compute by ^67db20. Also see here. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let and be -finite measure spaces, and let be a -measurable function on . Suppose that there exists such that for a.e. and for a.e. , and that . If , the integral

converges absolutely for a.e. , the function thus defined is in , and .

\begin{proof} Write , then we have

By ^67db20 we have

and we finish the proof. Also see here. \end{proof}

The following theorem is a generalization of Minkowski’s inequality, which replace as .

Theorem

Let and be -finite measure spaces, and let be a nonnegative -measurable function on . If , then

\begin{proof} If , it follows from Tonelli’s theorem. If , let be the conjugate exponent to and suppose . WLOG assume the right hand side is finite. Then by Tonelli’s theorem and Holder’s inequality, we have

So the map defined by

is a well-defined (i.e., the integral over with respect to is defined), bounded linear functional on , and

On the other hand, it follows from the Riesz representation theorem that

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

Remark. 用了 Riesz representation theorem. 右边凑一个 Holder 比较容易想到,左边是线性变换的模长就有点变态了。