Young

If , with , then .

\begin{proof} Let and consider its critical points. \end{proof}

Holder and Minkowski

Let be measurable functions. Then and satisfy the Hölder inequality

and the Minkowski inequality

\left(\int_X(f+g)^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p} \leqslant\left(\int_X f^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p}+\left(\int_X g^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p}. $$ ^cef2ff

\begin{proof} For Holder inequality, assume that and use ^bbb4ba.

For Minkowski inequality, we can suppose that and . It deduces that by and . Then by Holder inequality, there is

where , and . Now we finish the proof.

Also see here. \end{proof}

Definition of

Definition

Let be a measure space and let . Let be a measurable function on . The -norm of is the number

A function is called -integrable or an -function if it is measurable and . The space of -functions is denoted by

We say if a.e. respect to .

Remark. By Minkowski inequality, there is . Hence is indeed a norm.

Definition

Let be a measure space and let be a measurable function and set

and define the essential supremum of , denoted by , as

The set of -functions on will be denoted by

Lemma

Let . Then:

  • if , then ;
  • ;
  • iff that and iff that .

\begin{proof} i) is easy.

ii) Let with . Let , then . Since , we have that and so .

iii) is also easy. \end{proof}

Lemma

For a measurable function ,

  • iff a.e.;
  • iff there exists a bounded function such that almost everywhere.

\begin{proof} Easy. \end{proof}

Denote the equivalence class of a function under the equivalence relation almost everywhere. Then define and it is a norm space where is the norm.

Completeness

Recall that a metric space is called complete (or a Cauchy space) if every Cauchy sequence of points in has a limit that is also in .

Lemma

A normed vector space is complete iff every absolutely convergent series in converges.

\begin{proof} If is complete and , let . Then for , we have

so the sequence is Cauchy and hence convergent.

Conversely, suppose that every absolutely convergent series converges, and let be a Cauchy sequence. We can choose such that for . Let for . Then , and

so exists. But since is Cauchy, we know that converges to the same limit as . \end{proof}

Theorem

For , is complete. Hence, is a Banach space.

\begin{proof} i) When , define and . We aim to show there exists such that .

Consider , then and . By MCT, and so is a.e. finite. Therefore, converges almost everywhere and so converges almost everywhere. Let . Then and so . Therefore, and so converges to in the norm.

ii) Suppose now that and that is a sequence of functions that belong to and satisfy . For each positive integer , let , and .

We have and so . Hence for all , which implies that converges for all . Define

Then

Thus . Letting , we have , so , i.e., in . Therefore, is complete. \end{proof}

Remark. 虽然在 意义下 Cauchy 不一定收敛,但在一般的求和下 Cauchy 一定收敛。所以用 almost everywhere 就能说明 存在了。

Dense Subspace of

Proposition

The follows hold.

  • in uniformly a.e..
  • For any , simple measurable functions determine a dense subspace of .

\begin{proof} i) Assume that in . Let and let . Then and uniformly on . Conversely, if uniformly almost everywhere, then for any there exists such that a.e. and so in .

ii) Assume that . There exists simple functions such that pointwise satisfying . Note that , and it follows that and as by DCT.

Now assume that . Define , then . On , and so is bounded on . Therefore, a series of simple functions converges to uniformly on and so in . \end{proof}

Remark. We will prove that the set of continuous functions with compact support is also a dense subspace of for . See ^fe0685.

Dual Space & Riesz Representation Theorem

dual

Let be a measure space and let . Let be the conjugate exponent of , i.e., . Let and define by

Since by ^cef2ff, we have and so .

Lemma

Let be a -finite measure space. Let . If are in , where is the conjugate exponent of , such that , then a.e.

\begin{proof} It is easy. See here. \end{proof}

Theorem

Let be a finite measure space. Let . Let be a continuous linear functional on . Then, there exists a unique such that and .

\begin{proof} Let for all .

Claim that it and , then . In fact, let , then . Then in . It deduces that . Therefore, and so is a signed measure on .

If , then and so . By ^bdb1bb there exists such that for all . Now we proved that for all simple measurable , .

If , yields that . Let be simple measurable functions with and as . Since and , we have that . As , we have that .

When , claim that . Let and let so that . Let . Then we have . Since , there is . It follows that

and so .

When , . Then and so . It yields that and . Hence, a.e. and so . Now we proved that .

Since and for any simple measurable function , we have on a dense subspace of and . Note that yields , then we have done. \end{proof}

Riesz representation theorem

Let be a -finite measure space. Let . Let be a continuous linear functional on . Then, there exists a unique such that for all , and .

\begin{proof} Let with and . We identity as a subspace of . By ^051f47, there exists such that for all . Note that almost everywhere on . Define such that for . Claim that for all .

Note that in , and so . \end{proof}

Remark. 复习烦的要死,忽然发现这个证明不考。

Reflexivity & Weakly Convergence

Definition

A sequence in a Banach space weakly converges to an element , if for all , where is the dual space of .

Corollary

Let be a -finite measure space with ; then is reflexive. That is, .

Recall that a Banach space is reflexive if and only if every bounded sequence in the space has a weakly convergent subsequence. It deduces the following theorem. Furthermore, 如果一个函数列 空间中有界(也就是说,这些函数的 p-范数都小于某个固定的常数),那么我们总能找到一个子列 ,使得它在几乎处处的意义下收敛(也就是除了在一个零测集上之外, 会对每个 x 收敛).

The Riesz Weak Compactness Theorem

Let be a -finite measure space and . Then every bounded sequence in has a weakly convergent subsequence; that is, if is a bounded sequence , then there is a subsequence of and a function in for which

Interpolation

Lemma

If , then ; that is, each is the sum of a function in and a function in .

\begin{proof} If , let and set and . Then , so , and , so . (For , obviously .) \end{proof}

Theorem

If , then . For , we have , where is given by

\begin{proof} If , then where and so .

If , we use Holder’s inequality, taking the pair of conjugate exponents to be and

Also see here. \end{proof}