Young
If , with , then .
\begin{proof}
Let and consider its critical points.
\end{proof}
Holder and Minkowski
Let be measurable functions. Then and satisfy the Hölder inequality
and the Minkowski inequality
\left(\int_X(f+g)^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p} \leqslant\left(\int_X f^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p}+\left(\int_X g^p d \mu\right)^{1 / p}. $$ ^cef2ff
\begin{proof}
For Holder inequality, assume that and use ^bbb4ba.
For Minkowski inequality, we can suppose that and . It deduces that by and . Then by Holder inequality, there is
where , and . Now we finish the proof.
Also see here.
\end{proof}
Definition of
Definition
Let be a measure space and let . Let be a measurable function on . The -norm of is the number
A function is called -integrable or an -function if it is measurable and . The space of -functions is denoted by
We say if a.e. respect to .
Remark. By Minkowski inequality, there is . Hence is indeed a norm.
Definition
Let be a measure space and let be a measurable function and set
and define the essential supremum of , denoted by , as
The set of -functions on will be denoted by
Lemma
Let . Then:
- if , then ;
- ;
- iff that and iff that .
\begin{proof}
i) is easy.
ii) Let with . Let , then . Since , we have that and so .
iii) is also easy.
\end{proof}
Lemma
For a measurable function ,
- iff a.e.;
- iff there exists a bounded function such that almost everywhere.
\begin{proof}
Easy.
\end{proof}
Denote the equivalence class of a function under the equivalence relation almost everywhere. Then define and it is a norm space where is the norm.
Completeness
Recall that a metric space is called complete (or a Cauchy space) if every Cauchy sequence of points in has a limit that is also in .
Lemma
A normed vector space is complete iff every absolutely convergent series in converges.
\begin{proof}
If is complete and , let . Then for , we have
so the sequence is Cauchy and hence convergent.
Conversely, suppose that every absolutely convergent series converges, and let be a Cauchy sequence. We can choose such that for . Let for . Then , and
so exists. But since is Cauchy, we know that converges to the same limit as .
\end{proof}
Theorem
For , is complete. Hence, is a Banach space.
\begin{proof}
i) When , define and . We aim to show there exists such that .
Consider , then and . By MCT, and so is a.e. finite. Therefore, converges almost everywhere and so converges almost everywhere. Let . Then and so . Therefore, and so converges to in the norm.
ii) Suppose now that and that is a sequence of functions that belong to and satisfy . For each positive integer , let , and .
We have and so . Hence for all , which implies that converges for all . Define
Then
Thus . Letting , we have , so , i.e., in . Therefore, is complete.
\end{proof}
Remark. 虽然在 意义下 Cauchy 不一定收敛,但在一般的求和下 Cauchy 一定收敛。所以用 almost everywhere 就能说明 存在了。
Dense Subspace of
Proposition
The follows hold.
- in uniformly a.e..
- For any , simple measurable functions determine a dense subspace of .
\begin{proof}
i) Assume that in . Let and let . Then and uniformly on . Conversely, if uniformly almost everywhere, then for any there exists such that a.e. and so in .
ii) Assume that . There exists simple functions such that pointwise satisfying . Note that , and it follows that and as by DCT.
Now assume that . Define , then . On , and so is bounded on . Therefore, a series of simple functions converges to uniformly on and so in .
\end{proof}
Remark. We will prove that the set of continuous functions with compact support is also a dense subspace of for . See ^fe0685.
Dual Space & Riesz Representation Theorem
dual
Let be a measure space and let . Let be the conjugate exponent of , i.e., . Let and define by
Since by ^cef2ff, we have and so .
Lemma
Let be a -finite measure space. Let . If are in , where is the conjugate exponent of , such that , then a.e.
\begin{proof}
It is easy. See here.
\end{proof}
Theorem
Let be a finite measure space. Let . Let be a continuous linear functional on . Then, there exists a unique such that and .
\begin{proof}
Let for all .
Claim that it and , then . In fact, let , then . Then in . It deduces that . Therefore, and so is a signed measure on .
If , then and so . By ^bdb1bb there exists such that for all . Now we proved that for all simple measurable , .
If , yields that . Let be simple measurable functions with and as . Since and , we have that . As , we have that .
When , claim that . Let and let so that . Let . Then we have . Since , there is . It follows that
and so .
When , . Then and so . It yields that and . Hence, a.e. and so . Now we proved that .
Since and for any simple measurable function , we have on a dense subspace of and . Note that yields , then we have done.
\end{proof}
Riesz representation theorem
Let be a -finite measure space. Let . Let be a continuous linear functional on . Then, there exists a unique such that for all , and .
\begin{proof}
Let with and . We identity as a subspace of . By ^051f47, there exists such that for all . Note that almost everywhere on . Define such that for . Claim that for all .
Note that in , and so .
\end{proof}
Remark. 复习烦的要死,忽然发现这个证明不考。

Reflexivity & Weakly Convergence
Definition
A sequence in a Banach space weakly converges to an element , if for all , where is the dual space of .
Corollary
Let be a -finite measure space with ; then is reflexive. That is, .
Recall that a Banach space is reflexive if and only if every bounded sequence in the space has a weakly convergent subsequence. It deduces the following theorem. Furthermore, 如果一个函数列 在 空间中有界(也就是说,这些函数的 p-范数都小于某个固定的常数),那么我们总能找到一个子列 ,使得它在几乎处处的意义下收敛(也就是除了在一个零测集上之外, 会对每个 x 收敛).
The Riesz Weak Compactness Theorem
Let be a -finite measure space and . Then every bounded sequence in has a weakly convergent subsequence; that is, if is a bounded sequence , then there is a subsequence of and a function in for which
Interpolation
Lemma
If , then ; that is, each is the sum of a function in and a function in .
\begin{proof}
If , let and set and . Then , so , and , so . (For , obviously .)
\end{proof}
Theorem
If , then . For , we have , where is given by
\begin{proof}
If , then where and so .
If , we use Holder’s inequality, taking the pair of conjugate exponents to be and
Also see here.
\end{proof}