Definition
The Fourier transform of a function on , defined formally as
We first list some properties of in .
- Note that , then we have .
- is linear on .
- is a uniformly continuous function of on if . (By considering .)
- Riemann Lebesgue theorem. See here.
- (Translation) .
- (Dilation) Define , then .
- (Rotation) Let be an orthogonal linear transformation of , then .
- The Fourier transform of an integrable radial function is a radial function.
- Let , then .
- Gauss-Weierstrass kernel
- (Shifting hats) .
Theorem
Suppose and .
- (1) For each is infinitely differentiable. For each non-negative integers
We use the convention that the order derivative of a function is just the function itself.
- (2) a.e. as .
- (3) If is continuous, then uniformly on compact sets as .
- (4) If and , then in .
\begin{proof}
See here.
\end{proof}
Proposition
Suppose and . Let .
- If is continuous with compact support, then converges to pointwise as .
- If is continuous with compact support, then converges to in as .
- If , then as .
\begin{proof}
See here. (我并没有看。
\end{proof}
Inversion of the Fourier transform on
If and are in , then
\begin{proof}
See here.
Uniqueness
If and for all , then a.e. in .
The Convolution Property
The convolution of any two integrable functions is also integrable and therefore has a well-defined Fourier transform.
Theorem
If , then
This follows easily from Fubini’s theorem and is left as an exercise.
Theorem
- Let , denote the th coordinate of . If and belong to , then has a partial derivative with respect to everywhere in , and
- Fix and let lie on the th coordinate axis. Suppose that and that there is a function such that
Then and
\begin{proof}
See here.
\end{proof}
Fourier Transform on
Lemma
Let . Then is uniformly continuous and bounded on , and .
\begin{proof}
By Cauchy inequality. See here.
\end{proof}
Plancherel
If is continuous with compact support, then and
\begin{proof}
By Gauss-Weierstrass kernel, we have
Take and take , then
Take and we finish the proof.
Also see here.
\end{proof}
Remark. If satisfying , then is Cauchy in and converges to a function in . We can check that is not depending on the choice of , and so it is well-defined. (That is the way how we define ?)