Definition

The Fourier transform of a function on , defined formally as

We first list some properties of in .

  • Note that , then we have .
  • is linear on .
  • is a uniformly continuous function of on if . (By considering .)
  • Riemann Lebesgue theorem. See here.
  • (Translation) .
  • (Dilation) Define , then .
  • (Rotation) Let be an orthogonal linear transformation of , then .
  • The Fourier transform of an integrable radial function is a radial function.
  • Let , then .
  • Gauss-Weierstrass kernel
  • (Shifting hats) .

Theorem

Suppose and .

  • (1) For each is infinitely differentiable. For each non-negative integers

We use the convention that the order derivative of a function is just the function itself.

  • (2) a.e. as .
  • (3) If is continuous, then uniformly on compact sets as .
  • (4) If and , then in .

\begin{proof} See here. \end{proof}

Proposition

Suppose and . Let .

  • If is continuous with compact support, then converges to pointwise as .
  • If is continuous with compact support, then converges to in as .
  • If , then as .

\begin{proof} See here. (我并没有看。 \end{proof}

Inversion of the Fourier transform on

If and are in , then

\begin{proof} See here.

Uniqueness

If and for all , then a.e. in .

The Convolution Property

The convolution of any two integrable functions is also integrable and therefore has a well-defined Fourier transform.

Theorem

If , then

This follows easily from Fubini’s theorem and is left as an exercise.


Theorem

  • Let , denote the th coordinate of . If and belong to , then has a partial derivative with respect to everywhere in , and
  • Fix and let lie on the th coordinate axis. Suppose that and that there is a function such that

Then and

\begin{proof} See here. \end{proof}

Fourier Transform on

Lemma

Let . Then is uniformly continuous and bounded on , and .

\begin{proof} By Cauchy inequality. See here. \end{proof}

Plancherel

If is continuous with compact support, then and

\begin{proof} By Gauss-Weierstrass kernel, we have

Take and take , then

Take and we finish the proof.

Also see here. \end{proof}

Remark. If satisfying , then is Cauchy in and converges to a function in . We can check that is not depending on the choice of , and so it is well-defined. (That is the way how we define ?)