1. Determine all equitable bipartitions of the hypercube such that the corresponding quotient matrix has eigenvalues and .

\begin{proof} Recall that hypercube has vertices , where iff for exactly one position.

We call the partition equitable if for all , where .

Link to original

原来 bipartition 是分两块的意思。。。

Let be a bipartition. Then , where , where and . Then the quotient matrix for some . Notice that is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue , which implies . Hence . If or , then has an entry , which contradicts with connected. So and .

Take and . Then is the adjacent matrix of and so , . Since and is a -regular graph, we have and so . Using similar construction, that is, fix one coordinate and

  • take and , or
  • take and .

Then we get bipartitions such that the corresponding quotient matrix has eigenvalues and .

It remains to check there does exist no other bipartition. Since , we know each row of has exactly one and so for . Then there exists a - correspondence between elements of set and . Assume that and , where and for any . If , then and for any , where is the standard basis. Repeat this procedure, we know for all . Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

2. Consider a polarity of a projective plane of order .

  • (a) Define a graph with vertex set , two points adjacent if . Determine the spectrum of . Note that has loops.
  • (c) Let be the induced subgraph of obtained by removing all vertices adjacent to themselves. Show that the spectrum of is in .

\begin{proof} Recall that a polarity is a bijection that sends points to lines and lines to points, .

is called the order of the projective plane .

Link to original

a) Let be a adjacent matrix. Then satisfies and as two lines has exactly one common point. Hence .

Note that , then is an eigenvalue of . For any eigenvector of , we assume that . Since , we have . So . Therefore, .

Since , we have . If is not a perfect square, then by we have . If is a perfect square, then , where .

c) Let be a adjacent matrix of . Recall that

If is a principal submatrix of , then the eigenvalues of interlace the eigenvalues of .

Link to original

Then we know the eigenvalue of interlace the eigenvalues of . Let be all eigenvalues of . Then for .

It remains to show . GPT 告诉我这里有一个反例:

Take the projective plane . Define , and define . Since , we have . Since is non-degenerated, has dimension and so . Hence is a polarity.

There are three vertices adjacent to themselves, and so . Note that . Let be a adjacent matrix of . Then . Since , the spectrum of is NOT in . \end{proof}

3.

  • (a) Determine the spectrum of the point-line incidence graph of .
  • (b) We call a collection of -subsets of points of a -uniform local arc if the are pairwise disjoint, and is an arc. Show that for fixed,

\begin{proof} a) Let be a adjacent matrix of the point-line incidence graph. Then , where is the point-line incidence matrix. Note that both and have eigenvector , then is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue .

Assume that is an eigenvector of , then . It follows that and .

Since , the spectrum of is , where . So by ^vnqcpz.

b) 白给的尝试:Assume that and such that where iff . Let , where if . Then , where . We also have and so , where and . By ^ja6tar, we know and so .

Let be a -uniform local arc, and let . Then . Note that the point-line incidence graph of is -regular and by a). By ^dhoh0u, for any set of points and any set of lines, we have

where . Define . Since is an arc, is also an arc and then each determines exactly secant lines. Note that for any , which follows that . By we have

Furthermore, , then we have

So

Now we finish the proof. \end{proof}

4. Consider the odd cycles , where .

  • (a) Use the ratio bound to show that .
  • (b) Use the inertia bound to show that .
  • (c) Show that both bounds are tight.

\begin{proof} a) Recall that is the independence number of . Since the minimal eigenvalue of is by ^mt7vc7, there is by ^j2qp40. Since , we have .

b) By ^s7pdtq, . Since there does not exist such that , we have . Therefore, .

c) Assume that , where and . Then is an independent set and so both bounds are tight. \end{proof}

5. Consider the Johnson graph , whose vertices are the -subsets of , with two vertices adjacent when their intersection has size . Let be its adjacency matrix.

  • (a) Show that is regular of degree .
  • (b) Determine the number of common neighbors of two vertices , depending on .
  • (c) Write as a linear combination of .
  • (d) Determine the spectrum of .

\begin{proof} a) For each point , consider the neighborhoods of . If and , then there are ‘s such that . Similarly for and . So is regular of degree .

b) It is easy to check that

  • if , then the number of common neighbors of is ;
  • if , then the number of common neighbors of is ;
  • if , then the number of common neighbors of is ;
  • if , then the number of common neighbors of is .

c) By b) we have

Recall that is the number of -walks from to , then we have

The cases of are easy to check. When , take and . Then

  • with , and has choices;
  • , and has choices;
  • with , and has 4 choices;
  • , and has choices.

Therefore, one obtains the following table:

Solving for constants such that , we get

d) Since is regular of degree , is an eigenvector with eigenvalue .

On the subspace orthogonal to the all-one vector, we have . So every non-principal eigenvalue satisfies

by c). Note that this factors as

Therefore, the eigenvalues are , , and .

Assume that these multiplicities are , respectively. Then we have ,

and

Therefore, we have

Now we finish the solution. \end{proof}

6. Determine existence or nonexistence for each of the following SRG parameters:

  • (a) ,
  • (b) ,
  • (c) ,
  • (d) ,
  • (e) ,
  • (f) .

\begin{proof} Recall that ^bebz6b and ^peg7jo.

a) Since and , such SRG does not exist.

b) is an example.

c) The Shrikhande graph is an example.

d) Eigenvalues are and . Then is not an integer and so such SRG does not exist.

e) One can compute that , , , and . Since does not hold, by absolute bound such SRG does not exist.

f) One can compute that , , , and . Since does not hold, by absolute bound such SRG does not exist. \end{proof}